Abstract
AbstractThe human footprint is rapidly expanding, and wildlife habitat is continuously being converted to human residential properties. Surviving wildlife that reside in developing areas are displaced to nearby undeveloped areas. However, some animals can co-exist with humans and acquire the necessary resources (food, water, shelter) within the human environment. This ability to coexist may be particularly true when development is low intensity, as in residential suburban yards. Yards are individually managed “greenspaces” that can provide a range of food (e.g., bird feeders, compost, gardens), water (bird baths and garden ponds), and shelter (e.g., brush-piles, outbuildings) resources and are surrounded by varying landscape cover. To evaluate which residential landscape and yard features influence the richness and diversity of mammalian herbivores and mesopredators; we deployed wildlife game cameras throughout Northwestern Arkansas, USA in 46 residential yards in summer 2021 and 96 yards in summer 2022. We found that mesopredator diversity had a negative relationship with fences and was positively influenced by the number of bird feeders present in a yard. Mesopredator richness increased with the amount of forest within 400 m of the camera. Herbivore diversity and richness were positively correlated to the area of forest within 400 m surrounding yard and by garden area within yards, respectively. Our results suggest that while landscape does play a role in the presence of wildlife in a residential area, homeowners also have agency over the richness and diversity of mammals using their yards based on the features they create or maintain on their properties.
Funder
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission
University of Arkansas Office of Undergraduate Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference75 articles.
1. Armitage K (2000) The evolution, ecology, and systematics of marmots. Oecologia Montana 9(1–2):1–18. Retrieved from http://om.vuvb.uniza.sk/index.php/OM/article/view/116
2. Baker PJ, Harris S (2007) Urban mammals: what does the future hold? An analysis of the factors affecting patterns of use of residential gardens in Great Britain. Mammal Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00102.x
3. Barden ME, Slate D, Calvert RT, Debow PW (1995) Strategies to Adress Human Conflicts with Raccoons and Black Bears in New Hampshire. Proc East Wild! Damage Control Conf
4. Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2012) Big City Life: carnivores in urban environments. J Zool 287(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00887.x
5. Belaire JA, Westphal LM, Whelan CJ, Minor ES (2015) Urban residents’ perceptions of birds in the neighborhood: Biodiversity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices. Condor 117(2):192–202. https://doi.org/10.1650/condor-14-128.1
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献