Choice models in Nordic long-term care: care managers' experiences of privilege and disadvantage among older adults

Author:

Erlandsson SaraORCID,Brodin HeleneORCID,Graff LeaORCID,Karsio OlliORCID

Abstract

AbstractConsumer choice models have been introduced in eldercare services in several Western welfare societies. Choice models in eldercare emphasise the importance of individuals’ abilities to make informed choices and therefore entail a risk for increased inequalities among older adults with care needs. In the Nordic countries, such inequality risks are in stark contrast to universal policy ambitions of equal access to care services. Care managers, who are responsible for needs assessment for eldercare services, have a central role in implementing policies and, thus, have first-hand experience of their impact on older adults’ access to care. The aim of this study was to explore care managers’ experiences of how user choice affects older adults’ access to care services in three Nordic cities: Copenhagen, Tampere, and Stockholm. These cities were purposely selected as forerunners in marketisation, with different ways of implementing choice models. Semi-structured interviews with care managers were conducted in Copenhagen, Tampere, and Stockholm and analysed thematically. The findings indicate there are difficulties related to older adults’ ability to access information needed to make informed choices, as well as limitations in choice related to available services and personal finances. Further, care managers find that older adults’ abilities to overcome these difficulties are shaped by their health, education, language skills, and assistance from relatives. In order to reduce the risk of choice models increasing the gap between older adults with different resources and capabilities, there is a need to develop accessible information, as well as models for professional guidance.

Funder

NordForsk

Stockholm University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Health (social science)

Reference36 articles.

1. Anttonen A, Meagher G (2013) Mapping marketisation: concepts and goals. In: Meagher G, Szebehely M (eds) Marketisation in Nordic eldercare. Stockholm University, Stockholm, pp 13–22

2. Baxter K, Glendinning C, Clarke S (2008) Making informed choices in social care: the importance of accessible information. Health Soc Care Community 16:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00742.x

3. Baxter K, Heavey E, Birks Y (2020) Choice and control in social care: experiences of older self-funders in England. Soc Policy Adm 54:460–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12534

4. Bertelsen TM, Rostgaard T (2013) Marketisation in eldercare in Denmark: free choice and the quest for quality and efficiency. In: Meagher G, Szebehely M (eds) Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare. Stockholm University, Stockholm, pp 127–162

5. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3