Abstract
AbstractConsumer choice models have been introduced in eldercare services in several Western welfare societies. Choice models in eldercare emphasise the importance of individuals’ abilities to make informed choices and therefore entail a risk for increased inequalities among older adults with care needs. In the Nordic countries, such inequality risks are in stark contrast to universal policy ambitions of equal access to care services. Care managers, who are responsible for needs assessment for eldercare services, have a central role in implementing policies and, thus, have first-hand experience of their impact on older adults’ access to care. The aim of this study was to explore care managers’ experiences of how user choice affects older adults’ access to care services in three Nordic cities: Copenhagen, Tampere, and Stockholm. These cities were purposely selected as forerunners in marketisation, with different ways of implementing choice models. Semi-structured interviews with care managers were conducted in Copenhagen, Tampere, and Stockholm and analysed thematically. The findings indicate there are difficulties related to older adults’ ability to access information needed to make informed choices, as well as limitations in choice related to available services and personal finances. Further, care managers find that older adults’ abilities to overcome these difficulties are shaped by their health, education, language skills, and assistance from relatives. In order to reduce the risk of choice models increasing the gap between older adults with different resources and capabilities, there is a need to develop accessible information, as well as models for professional guidance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Health (social science)
Reference36 articles.
1. Anttonen A, Meagher G (2013) Mapping marketisation: concepts and goals. In: Meagher G, Szebehely M (eds) Marketisation in Nordic eldercare. Stockholm University, Stockholm, pp 13–22
2. Baxter K, Glendinning C, Clarke S (2008) Making informed choices in social care: the importance of accessible information. Health Soc Care Community 16:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00742.x
3. Baxter K, Heavey E, Birks Y (2020) Choice and control in social care: experiences of older self-funders in England. Soc Policy Adm 54:460–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12534
4. Bertelsen TM, Rostgaard T (2013) Marketisation in eldercare in Denmark: free choice and the quest for quality and efficiency. In: Meagher G, Szebehely M (eds) Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare. Stockholm University, Stockholm, pp 127–162
5. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献