Abstract
AbstractEdmund Husserl’s ultimate aim was to give an overall philosophical explanation of the totality of Being. In this endeavour, the term “absolute” was crucial for him. In this paper, I aim to clarify the most important ways in which Husserl used this notion. I attempt to show that, despite his rather divergent usages, eventually three fundamental meanings and coordinated levels of the “absolute” can be differentiated in his thought: the epistemological (absolute evidence and ego), the ontological (intersubjectivity), and the theological or metaphysical level (God). According to Husserl, we can approach this ultimate level of the Absolute, through the method of phenomenological construction. A closer reading of Husserl’s texts shows that his conception of the absolute was astonishingly modern. The main features of the conception—on all three levels—were non-foundationalism, contextualism, openness, and circularity. Each level mutually founds and determines the others. It is a non-foundational Absolute, the moments of which constitute an organic and open totality which is essentially processual. In my interpretation, this theory opens a fruitful working area, which has enormous philosophical potential and is surprisingly up-to-date.
Funder
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Budapest Business School - University of Applied Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Berghofer, Philip. 2018. Why husserl is a moderate foundationalist. Husserl Studies 34(1): 1–23.
2. Rudolf, Bernet, Kern Iso, and Marbach Eduard. 1996. Edmund Husserl. Darstellung seines. Hamburg: Denkens.
3. Bernstein, Richard J. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4. Boehm, Rudolf. 1959. Zum Begriff des “Absoluten” bei Husserl. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, Bd. 13, H. 2, Erweitertes Heft zum 100.Geburtstag von Edmund Husserl. pp. 214–242.
5. De Palma, Vittorio. 2019. Deskription oder Konstruktion? Husserl und die Grenzen der Phänomenologie. Husserl Studies 35: 185–202.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献