Levels of the absolute in Husserl

Author:

Marosan Bence Peter

Abstract

AbstractEdmund Husserl’s ultimate aim was to give an overall philosophical explanation of the totality of Being. In this endeavour, the term “absolute” was crucial for him. In this paper, I aim to clarify the most important ways in which Husserl used this notion. I attempt to show that, despite his rather divergent usages, eventually three fundamental meanings and coordinated levels of the “absolute” can be differentiated in his thought: the epistemological (absolute evidence and ego), the ontological (intersubjectivity), and the theological or metaphysical level (God). According to Husserl, we can approach this ultimate level of the Absolute, through the method of phenomenological construction. A closer reading of Husserl’s texts shows that his conception of the absolute was astonishingly modern. The main features of the conception—on all three levels—were non-foundationalism, contextualism, openness, and circularity. Each level mutually founds and determines the others. It is a non-foundational Absolute, the moments of which constitute an organic and open totality which is essentially processual. In my interpretation, this theory opens a fruitful working area, which has enormous philosophical potential and is surprisingly up-to-date.

Funder

Magyar Tudományos Akadémia

Budapest Business School - University of Applied Science

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Reference62 articles.

1. Berghofer, Philip. 2018. Why husserl is a moderate foundationalist. Husserl Studies 34(1): 1–23.

2. Rudolf, Bernet, Kern Iso, and Marbach Eduard. 1996. Edmund Husserl. Darstellung seines. Hamburg: Denkens.

3. Bernstein, Richard J. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

4. Boehm, Rudolf. 1959. Zum Begriff des “Absoluten” bei Husserl. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, Bd. 13, H. 2, Erweitertes Heft zum 100.Geburtstag von Edmund Husserl. pp. 214–242.

5. De Palma, Vittorio. 2019. Deskription oder Konstruktion? Husserl und die Grenzen der Phänomenologie. Husserl Studies 35: 185–202.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3