The Metaphysical Magnificence of Reduction: The Pure Ego and Its Substrate According to Phenomenology and Vedanta

Author:

Louchakova-Schwartz Olga12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA

2. Jesuit School of Theology, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA

Abstract

This article examines relationships between the absolute being of the universal ego (Ātman-self) according to the Indian religious philosophy of Vedanta (V) and the phenomenological, irreal being of the transcendental ego in Husserl’s phenomenology (P). Both Ātman and the transcendental ego are accessed in the first-person perspective by onto-phenomenological reductions. Such reductions, as stated by Husserl, have absolute freedom of positing and, thus, can reveal or conceal states of being. In contrast with P-reduction, which renders the being of the ego-pole invisible, V-reduction penetrates into the being of the ego-pole and opens a horizon of unique, non-intentional mental states. Following the dialectics in pre- and post-reduction givenness of being, there emerges a picture of connection between the intentional phenomenological being of the transcendental ego and the non-intentional being of the pure ego of Vedanta (Ātman-self). The pure ego of Vedanta manifests as a substrate for the transcendental ego of phenomenology. From this, we can conclude that reductions function as the loci of dialectical syntheses of being, whereby the unity of being has a fuller, more complex and multi-sided sense than the one intended in the natural attitude. In their breaking of theoretical habits conditioned by the substance metaphysical tradition, reductions are truly indispensable in the revelation of being that grounds the theory of knowledge.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Religious studies

Reference67 articles.

1. Angot, Michel (2007). Taittirīya-Upaṇiṣad = Śāṃkarabhāṣyasahitā Taittirīyopaniṣat yopaniṣat: Avec le commentaire de Śaṃkara, Boccard.

2. Nothing But Gold. Complexities in Terms of Non-difference and Identity;Journal of Indian Philosophy,2021

3. Kjosavik, Frode, and Serck-Hanssen, Camilla (2021). Metametaphysics and the Sciences, Routledge.

4. Brainard, Marcus (2002). Husserl’s System of Phenomenology in Ideas 1, SUNY.

5. Brenner, Joseph E., and Igamberdiev, Abir U. (2021). Philosophy in Reality: A New Book of Changes, Springer. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics 60.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3