Abstract
AbstractThe study aimed to evaluate the safety and probiotic properties of selected Lactobacillus strains, which are intended to be fed to monogastric animals. The Lactobacillus spp. appeared to be safe since they did not degrade mucus and did not exhibit β-haemolysis. Moreover, the survival of Caco-2 cells in the presence of metabolites of the selected strains was high, which also indicated their safety. The analysed strains showed moderate or strong antagonistic activity against Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, which was tested with the usage of the agar slab method. Furthermore, the strains showed high survivability in an acidic environment and the presence of bile salts (~90%). High resistivity or moderate susceptibility to antibiotics was also observed, as a result of the disc diffusion method. The strains were mostly moderately hydrophilic (hydrophobicity: 10.43–41.14%); nevertheless, their auto-aggregation capability exceeded 50% and their co-aggregation with pathogens varied between 12.12 and 85.45%. The ability of the selected strains to adhere to Caco-2 cells was also analysed; they were found to be moderately adhesive (85.09–95.05%) and able to hinder pathogens attaching to the cells (up to 62.58%). The analysed strains exhibit probiotic properties, such as high survivability and adherence to epithelial cells; therefore, they are suitable for administration to monogastric animals. Since the overuse of antibiotic growth promoters in livestock leads to the spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and accumulation of chemotherapeutic residues in food of animal origin, it is of vital importance to introduce alternative feed additives.
Funder
Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine,Microbiology
Reference74 articles.
1. Goldstein EJC, Tyrrell KL, Citron DM (2015) Lactobacillus species: taxonomic complexity and controversial susceptibilities. Clin Infect Dis 60:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ072
2. Riaz Rajoka MS, Mehwish HM, Siddiq M, Haobin Z, Zhu J, Yan L, Shao D, Xu X, Shi J (2017) Identification, characterization, and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus isolated from human milk. LWT - Food Sci Technol 84:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.05.055
3. Shi Y, Zhao J, Kellingray L, Zhang H, Narbad A, Zhai Q, Chen W (2018) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of Lactobacillus strains and comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC12436 reveal candidates of colonise-related genes. Food Res Int 119:813–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.064
4. Archacka M, Białas W, Dembczyński R, Olejnik A, Sip A, Szymanowska D, Celińska E, Jankowski T, Olejnik A, Rogodzińska M (2019) Method of preservation and type of protective agent strongly influence probiotic properties of Lactococcus lactis: a complete process of probiotic preparation manufacture and use. Food Chem 274:733–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.033
5. FAO/WHO (2002) Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Working Group Report. http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0512e.pdf. Accessed 02 December 2019
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献