Human-centered approaches in working environments needs ethical reflection—Experiences from KARL

Author:

Krings Bettina-Johanna,Frey Philipp

Abstract

AbstractIn our paper, we discuss some insights from our work in the regional Centre of Competence of Artificial Intelligence (KARL), which deals with the implementation and application of Artificial Intelligence in working and learning environments. We present a conceptual framework that we have developed to define social, legal and ethical dimensions of AI in working environments. As a first step, the article describes the definition of these aspects within the technical development processes in KARL with an emphasis on ethical issues. Furthermore, a practical example is used to illustrate how normative premises can be elaborated to inform the design process of AI-systems. Next, the process of development and implementation of AI-systems in working environments is taken into account. The article explicitly emphasises the importance of ethical reflection, i.e. on norms such as fairness, social sustainability and the creation of meaningful work, to inform in human-centered approaches to AI-based work.Practical Relevance: This paper discusses a process-oriented, human-centred approach to AI-based work. The joint negotiation and definition of “human-centred work with AI” in each specific context with all concerned stakeholders lies at its heart. The concretisation of these implications is of great importance for the practical implementation of the overarching concept, as it is only in practice that it becomes clear whether and how a participatory design approach is successful, which areas of tension and problems arise and how these can be dealt with.

Funder

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. TAB-Hintergrundpapier 26;S Albrecht,2023

2. Alpers S, Krings B‑J, Welf S, Becker C, Brücklmayr J, Dreher AK, Frey P, Miriam K, Rill M, Take M, Vugrincic A, Weinreuter M (2023) KARL GF5 Leitfaden – Whitepaper zu ethischen, rechtlichen und sozialen Aspekten im Kontext von Künstlicher Intelligenz für Arbeit und Lernen. https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000161674/151236658. Accessed 26 Mar 2024

3. Alpers S, Krings B‑J, Becker C, Rill M, Weinreuter M (2024) Ethische, rechtliche und soziale Aspekte (ELSA) der Gestaltung von KI-Systemen: Systematisierung der Betrachtung durch Vorgehensmodelle und Leitfäden. Z Arbeitsforsch (im Erscheinen)

4. Bellon J, Nähr-Wagener (2020) Interdisziplinarität, ELSI und Integrierte Forschung – aus einem Vieles und aus Vielem Eines? In: Gransche B, Manzeschke A (eds) Das geteilte Ganze. Horizontale integrierte Forschung für künftige Mensch-Technik-Verhältnisse. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp 37–52

5. Bijker WE, Law J (eds) (1992) Shaping technology; building society. Studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3