Flexibles Arbeiten als Privileg oder Selbstverständlichkeit? Die Art des Zugangs zu flexiblem Arbeiten steuert reziproke Ansichten und soziale Austauschbeziehungen in hybriden Teams

Author:

Hartner-Tiefenthaler Martina,Zedlacher Eva,Clarke Sharon

Abstract

AbstractLiterature suggests that employees reciprocate the ‘privilege’ for flexible working arrangements (FWA) with higher effort. Drawing on social exchange theory, our interview study investigated how leaders shape members’ beliefs about the need to reciprocate the access to FWA. Based on 20 interviews nested in ten teams from two organisations, we analysed how FWA are perceived and negotiated between team leaders and their members, and whether low or high prevalence of FWA in teams plays a role for establishing social exchange relationships. The interviews took place prior to Covid-19. While in one organisation access to FWA was negotiated individually only due to a specific need, in the other organisation it was facilitated more easily and granting FWA had evolved as a social norm. Our findings indicate that in both contexts FWA indeed initiated social exchange relationships, as team members often tried to return the favour for access to FWA by maintaining the performance and/or by showing high flexibility. When FWA were granted to selected members only (low prevalence), ‘score-keeping’ and ‘quid-pro-quo exchanges’ were mentioned as important exchange rules in the accounts. In the organisation with high FWA prevalence, cooperative team routines showed that members felt the need to reciprocate the favour to other team members or the organisation rather than directly to the leader. However, even in this organisation, leaders were able to establish employees’ belief in privilege and their obligation to reciprocate in order for them not to lose access to FWA. Our findings show the role of the leader in shaping and instrumentalising FWA. The study has high practical relevance for hybrid teams and discusses the essential role of leaders in FWA.

Funder

TU Wien

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. (2014) Flexible working regulations. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1398/pdfs/uksi_20141398_en.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014

2. Allen TD, Johnson RC, Kiburz KM, Shockley KM (2013) Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychol 66(2):345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012

3. Allen TD, Golden TD, Shockley KM (2015) How effective Is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol Sci Public Interest 16(2):40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

4. Baumgaertner M, Hartner-Tiefenthaler M (2022) Tackling the autonomy paradox: A team perspective on the individual use of time-spatial flexibility. In: Dulebohn J, Murray B, Stone D (eds) Managing teams in modern organization. Research in human resource management. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 195–223

5. Berkery E, Morley MJ, Tiernan S, Peretz H (2020) From start to finish: flexi-time as a social exchange and its impact on organizational outcomes. Eur Manag J 38(4):591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3