Abstract
AbstractThe water’s edge is a critically important and efficient location to trade with other partners by connecting inland water channels and sea lanes and to obtain food provisions from the biologically diverse and productive sea. Human civilization has built around the ports and harbors by constructing fixed structures to support waterborne transport and enhance or sustain city functions for millennia. These artificially fixed structures are not in natural equilibrium with the environment (water and sediment). Access channels and the sea bottom adjacent to piers are often dredged to accommodate larger ships. Bottom sediment dredging is a part of port management. Where to place the dredged material is of primary concern for port authorities because of its sheer volume and the potential to be chemically contaminated. The London Convention and the London Protocol (LC/LP) are international treaties that provide a process in preventing pollution from dumping of contaminated material at sea, and finding sound alternatives such as confined disposal facilities, and using clean dredged material in wetland creation or beach nourishment, based on the precautionary approach. The Anthropocene (Anthropocene refers to the most recent period in Earth’s history when human activity started to impact significantly on the climate and ecosystems.) coast of ports, harbors, wetlands, shorelines, and beaches of the coastal megacities faces tremendous challenges in managing navigational and shoreline infrastructure in view of sea level rise and climate change. Dredged sediments are a resource and are a key to protection of shorelines. The benefits of being members of the LC/LP treaties are that there is a wealth of various national experiences on sediment management available via the network of LC/LP national experts and in the records of the LC/LP’s Meetings of Contracting Parties.
Funder
East China Normal University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ocean Engineering,Waste Management and Disposal,Oceanography
Reference34 articles.
1. Abel JR, Dey I, Gabe TM (2011) Productivity and the density of human capital. J Reg Sci 52:562–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00742.x
2. Brand E, Ramaekers G, Lodder Q (2022) Dutch experience with sand nourishments for dynamic coastline conservation – An operational overview. Ocean Coastal Manag 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.106008
3. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, Oneill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
4. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
5. Crooks S, Windham-Myers L, Troxler T. G (2018) Defining blue carbon: the emergence of a climate context for coastal carbon dynamics. A blue carbon primer. CRC Press, pp 1–8