Research on the selection of cognitive diagnosis model from the perspective of experts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Research on the selection of cognitive diagnosis model from the perspective of experts

Published:2023-11-18 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1046-1310
Container-title:Current Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Curr Psychol

Author:

Wu Xiaopeng^ORCID,Sun Siyu,Xu Tianshu,Wang Axi

Funder

Yuanhui Youth Development Program: A study on the appropriateness of cognitive diagnostic assessment in Mathematics

Teacher Education “JIEBANGLINGTI” Project of Northeast Normal University: Learning Progression Construction and Learning Path Analysis Based on Cognitive Diagnosis

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-023-05438-8.pdf

Reference47 articles.

1. Abele, S., & von Davier, M. (2019). CDMs in vocational education: Assessment and usage of diagnostic problem-solving strategies in car mechatronics. Handbook of diagnostic classification models: Models and model extensions, applications, software packages, 461-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05584-4_22

2. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. In Selected papers of hirotugu akaike (pp. 371–386). New York, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29

3. Akbay, L., Terzi, R., Kaplan, M., & Karaaslan, K. G. (2017). Expert-based attribute identification and validation on fraction subtraction: A cognitively diagnostic assessment application. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4341.103

4. Birenbaum, M., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1993). Applying an IRT-based cognitive diagnostic model to diagnose students’ knowledge states in multiplication and division with exponents. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(4), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0604_1

5. Chen, J., de la Torre, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive diagnosis modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00185.x