Abstract
AbstractBullying is a serious problem around the world, especially among adolescents. Evidence exists that low levels of social perspective-taking as well as belief in a just world played an important role in bullying. Both dispositions function as psychological resources that may help students behave appropriately in social life. Previous research identified distinct bullying roles such as perpetrator, victim, assistant, reinforcer, defender, and bystander experiences. Although this participant-role approach has been extensively investigated in the last years, a simultaneous examination of students’ perspective-taking and belief in a just world in relation to their experiences in these roles is still missing. This study’s objective was to examine a differential approach of school students’ visuospatial and dispositional social perspective-taking, emotional concern, and personal belief in a just world in relation to their experiences in bullying roles. We tested these relations in a sample of n = 1309 adolescents (50.6% female, Mage = 13.73, SDage = 0.85) from 38 schools in Germany. The results from a latent structural-equation model suggested that experiences as a perpetrator, assistant, reinforcer but also as defender related to low visuospatial social perspective-taking. Emotional concern was positively related to defender experiences. Personal belief in a just world was negatively associated with experiences as a perpetrator and a victim. The results underline the importance of disentangling concurrent contributions of perspective-taking and belief in a just world related to the bullying roles. We conclude that adolescents’ visuospatial social perspective taking seems to be a further mental resource against antisocial behavior in bullying.
Funder
Fachhochschule des Mittelstands (FHM) GmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference101 articles.
1. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
2. Barreda-Angeles, M., Aleix-Guillaume, S., & Pereda-Banos, A. (2020). An ‘“Empathy Machine”’ or a ‘“Just-for-the-Fun-of-It”’ Machine? Effects of immersion in nonfiction 360-video stories on empathy and enjoyment. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 23(10), 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0665
3. Bierhoff, H. W. (1994). Verantwortung und altruistische Persönlichkeit. [Responsibility and altruistic personality.]. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 25(3), 217–226.
4. Bierhoff, H. W., Klein, R., & Kramp, P. (1991). Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research. Journal of Personality, 59(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00776.x
5. Bjereld, Y., Daneback, K., Löfstedt, P., Bjarnason, T., Tynjälä, J., Välimaa, R., & Petzold, M. (2017). Time trends of technology mediated communication with friends among bullied and not bullied children in four Nordic countries between 2001 and 2010. Child: Care Health and Development, 43(3), 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12409
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献