Abstract
AbstractIn 2019, there were over 75,000 children and young people in out-of-home care in England and Wales. Recent estimates suggest that up to half a million British people were in state or voluntary care as children, around 1% of the adult population. While individual experiences vary enormously by time and place, care-experienced people share in common the intensive documentation of their lives by social workers, educators, health professionals and associated practitioners. A complex, fragmented legislative and regulatory framework governs the creation and use of these records at the national level. Under UK law, a ‘care file’ must be retained for at least 75 years, so that a substantial legacy of care data is held across the public, voluntary and private sectors. MIRRA: Memory—Identity—Rights in Records—Access, a participatory research project co-produced with care leavers, investigated recordkeeping practices in child social care from multiple perspectives. Interviews, focus groups and workshops with stakeholders identified critical failings in the creation, use, management and access to care records, which do not account for the needs and capabilities of multiple stakeholders. These failings have a direct impact on the well-being and health of care-experienced people throughout their lives. MIRRA researchers developed a human-centred participatory recordkeeping approach to child social care, which this article describes. The approach combines the participatory continuum model (Rolan in Arch Sci 17(3):195–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7, 2017) and the capabilities approach to social work, rooting child social care recordkeeping in information rights principles. The article makes a contribution to the literature that discusses archival science within a human rights and ethics framework and reflects on trauma-informed practice for information professionals. It also provides guidance on practice improvements for child social care recording.
Funder
Arts and Humanities Research Council
University College London
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,History
Reference44 articles.
1. Application no. 10454/83. Case of Gaskin vs the United Kingdom (1989) European Court of Human Rights, Judgement, Strasbourg. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#. Accessed 25 Mar 2020
2. British Association of Social Workers (2018) 80–20 Campaign: how much ‘direct’ time do social workers spend with children and families. BASW England, London
3. Care Leavers’ Association (2016) It’s my journey: it’s my life! Care leavers and access to social care files. Access To Records Campaign Group. https://www.accesstocarerecords.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/CLA-ATR-report-final-feb-2016.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2020
4. Caswell M (2014) Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Arch Sci 14(3–4):307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
5. Council of Europe (2005) Framework convention on the value of cultural heritage for society (Faro convention). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680083746. Accessed 24 March 2020
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献