Touches across time: queer as provenance

Author:

Freeman ElliotORCID

Abstract

AbstractCarolyn Dinshaw describes her queer historical practice as being about looking for “an affective connection, for community, for even a touch across time” (1999, p 21). Queer engagements with records—these touches across time—are not easily or adequately accounted for in current conceptualisations of provenance. The dissonance between how we currently understand record co-creation, and the historical perspectives and recordkeeping needs of queer users, substantially and negatively impacts the visibility and accessibility of queer histories in institutional archival settings. In this paper, I articulate the proposed concept of queer as provenance. I argue that we must extend our current conceptualisation of multiple provenance beyond mere co-creatorship. With a focus on queer records and record users, I argue that we must expand our understanding to encapsulate not only the relationship between record, creator, and subject, but also the relationship between record, creator, subject, and user. Through a continuum lens, I consider how queer/ing engagements and interactions with, and responses to, queer records could and should inform our descriptive practices, and explore the potential of considering queer users as co-creators within such a dynamic. I conclude by articulating queer as provenance and consider its potential as a foundation on which transformative, reparative, and liberatory archival practices might be built.

Funder

Australian Government

Monash University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference66 articles.

1. Adler M (2013) Paraphilias: The perversion of meaning in the Library of Congress catalog. In: Keilty P, Dean R (Eds), Feminist and Queer Information Studies reader. Litwin Books, pp 309–321

2. Adler MA (2017) Cruising the library: perversities in the organization of knowledge. Fordham University Press

3. Adler M, Harper LM (2018) Race and ethnicity in classification systems: Teaching knowledge organization from a Social justice perspective. Library Trends 67(1):52–73. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0025

4. Ahmed S (2019) What’s the Use? Duke University Press, On the uses of use

5. Barrowcliffe R (2023) Reading between the lines: uncovering butchulla history in the K’gari research archive. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3