Recommendations for a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity: perspectives from a survey of students, faculty, and tutors

Author:

Kier Cheryl A.,Ives CindyORCID

Abstract

AbstractMaintaining academic integrity is a growing concern for higher education, increasingly so due to the pivot to remote learning in 2020 caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We canvassed students, faculty, and tutors at an online Canadian university about their perspectives on academic integrity and misconduct. The survey asked how the university could improve policies concerning issues of academic integrity, how faculty and tutors handled cases of misconduct, about satisfaction with how academic violations were treated, and about the role of students, faculty, and tutors in encouraging academic integrity. As well, we collected suggestions from respondents for reducing cheating, addressing academic misconduct, and general ideas about academic integrity. The distinction between misconduct and integrity was not always clear in their comments. We received responses from 228 students and 73 faculty and tutors, generating hundreds of comments. In this paper we focus only on the answers to open-ended questions. Using content analysis, we categorized the replies into similar threads. After multiple iterations of analysis, we extracted three general recommendation groupings: Policy and Procedures, Compliance and Commitment, and Resources. Based on respondents’ views, we propose a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity. Although we conducted the study pre-COVID-19, the recommendations apply to current and future academic integrity practices in our context and beyond.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Reference63 articles.

1. Amigud A Pell DJ 2021a When academic integrity rules should not apply: a survey of academic staff Assess Eval High Educ 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1826900

2. Amigud A Pell DJ 2021b Virtue, utility and improvisation: a multinational survey of academic staff solving integrity dilemmas J Acad Ethics https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09416-2

3. Awosoga O Varsanyi  S Nord C Barley R Meadows J 2021 Motivators for student academic dishonesty at a medium sized university in Alberta Canada Faculty and student perspectives‬ Can PerspectAcad Integrity 4 1 91 109‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

4. Bailey C, Challen R (2014) Student perceptions of the value of Turnitin text-matching software as a learning tool. Pract Res Higher Educ 9(1):38–51

5. Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd ed). Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3