Practical randomly selected question exam design to address replicated and sequential questions in online examinations

Author:

Elkhatat Ahmed M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractExaminations form part of the assessment processes that constitute the basis for benchmarking individual educational progress, and must consequently fulfill credibility, reliability, and transparency standards in order to promote learning outcomes and ensure academic integrity. A randomly selected question examination (RSQE) is considered to be an effective solution to mitigate sharing of questions between students by addressing replicated inter-examination questions that compromise examination integrity and sequential intra- examination questions that compromise examination comprehensivity. In this study, a Monte Carlo approach was used to design six examination schemes for the purpose of generating and evaluating 600 RSQEs in order to investigate the effects of RSQE design on replicated inter-examination and sequential and intra-examination questions. Results revealed that the number of randomly selected questions from the pool and the number of sub-pools inversely affected the replication and sequencing of the examination questions. Thus, by designing the RSQE in many sub-pools, in equivalence to the number of examination questions and selecting only one question from each sub-pool, and updating the sub-pools after each examination, the passing of information can be prevented, ensuring the integrity of the examinations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Reference40 articles.

1. Ali MM (2011) Creating learning management system using randomly selected question banks for effective e-learning. J E-Technol Vol 2(2):83

2. Balasubramanian B, DeSantis C, Gulotta M (2020) Assessment à la mode: implementing an adaptable large-scale multivariant online deferred-grade exam for virtual learning. J Chem Educ 97(12):4297–4302. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00767

3. Bengtsson L (2019) Take-home exams in higher education: a systematic review. Educ Sci 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040267

4. Blackboard. Best Practice: Effective Discussion Questions. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://help.blackboard.com/Learn/Instructor/Original/Interact/Best_Practices/Discussion_Question_Best_Practices

5. Bloom BS (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: cognitive domain. New York: McKay 20(24):1

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3