Transparent AI? Navigating Between Rules on Trade Secrets and Access to Information

Author:

Mylly Ulla-Maija

Abstract

AbstractAI systems are nowadays employed in ever-increasing areas. This new era of technological development is exciting, but AI applications are also a cause for concern. If tasks that have hitherto normally been undertaken by human beings are now to be taken care of by ever more intelligent autonomous systems, how can we be certain that such functions are performed diligently and safely? Many areas of application of AI systems have also made the tribulations of AI utilization apparent. The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) aims to tackle the concerns and challenges related to the utilization of AI, and to develop human-centric, secure, trustworthy, and ethical AI systems for the EU markets. The provisions of the AIA establish a system of compliance assessment that requires AI providers to disclose how high-risk AI systems have been trained and put together. This article will look at the role of disclosure obligations under the provisions of the AIA. The focus is on the tension between obligations to disclose information on the one hand and requirements to protect the trade secrets contained in the technical details of AI on the other. This article will explain how the technical details of AI contain some information that does not qualify for trade secret protection. And even when there are trade secrets, there are exceptions to trade secret protection. Rules to enable access to information form part of the Trade Secrets Directive, but other legislative instruments too enable access and make it necessary to navigate between access and confidentiality.

Funder

Hanken School of Economics

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference52 articles.

1. Abbott R (2016) I think, therefore I invent: creative computers and the future of patent law. Boston Coll Law Rev 57:1079–1126

2. Alì GS, Yu R (2021) Artificial intelligence between transparency and secrecy: from the EC whitepaper to the AIA and beyond. Eur J Law Technol 12

3. Aplin T (2017) Trading data in the digital economy: trade secrets perspective. In: Lohsse S, Schulze R, Staudenmayer D (eds) Trading data in the digital economy: legal concepts and tools. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp 59–72

4. Aplin T (2021) The limits of trade secret protection in the EU. In: Sandeen S, Rademacher C, Ohly A (eds) Research handbook on information law and governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 174–194

5. Burrell J (2016) How the machine ‘thinks’: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Bias audit laws: how effective are they at preventing bias in automated employment decision tools?;International Review of Law, Computers & Technology;2024-09-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3