Harmonisation of National Leniency Programmes in the EU: Is This Mission Accomplished? Remarks on the Case of France and Poland Compared with Other EU Member States

Author:

Korycińska-Rządca PaulinaORCID,Mendoza-Caminade Alexandra

Abstract

AbstractThe article critically discusses the requirements of the ECN+ Directive with regard to leniency programmes and whether the goal of this Directive – inter alia to eliminate discrepancies between national leniency programmes – has been achieved. The authors: (1) analyse in this respect the ECN+ Directive as well as the legal framework in EU Member States, focusing especially on France and Poland, but making reference also to selected other EU Member States, and (2) compare how these issues are regulated in those national legal orders to the standard required by the ECN+ Directive. The aim of this publication is to determine any potential differences in the approach taken by national legislators. The article also identifies certain shortcomings in the ECN+ Directive and national legal orders in the area under discussion and suggests amendments that could boost national leniency programmes. This research is based mainly on the dogmatic and comparative methods of analysis.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference39 articles.

1. Bacache-Beauvalleta M, Perrot A (2017) Economic regulation: which sectors to regulate and how? Les notes du conseil d’analyse économique 44:1–12. https://www.cae-eco.fr/en/Regulation-economique-quels-secteurs-reguler-et-comment-419. Accessed 10 Dec 2021

2. Baudu I (2019) Publication de la directive ECN: la politique européenne de la concurrence se renforce. Vers une mise en oeuvre plus efficace du droit de la concurrence au sein de l’Union européenne? Revue Lamy de la Concurrence 80(January):7

3. Bosco D (2021) Impact de la transposition de la directive ECN+ sur le programme de clémence français, revue Contrats Concurrence Consommation, n°7, Juillet 2021, 122:35–36

4. Bridier S (2021) Obtenir une clémence: les règles du jeu sont clarifiées. Revue Dalloz actualité 25 mai 2021. https://www.dalloz-actualite.fr/flash/obtenir-une-clemence-regles-du-jeu-sont-clarifiees#.YcwJlN_jJPY. Accessed 28 Dec 2021

5. Choné-Grimaldi AS (2019) Les maux de la traduction: nouvelles illustrations avec la directive ECN+? Recueil Dalloz 10:544–545

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3