Conflicts Between Trade Mark Rights and Freedom of Expression Under EU Trade Mark Law: Reality or Illusion?

Author:

Bohaczewski MichalORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe issue of reconciling trade mark rights and freedom of expression is a classic question discussed by European scholars which has recently been reopened because of the express reference to “fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the freedom of expression” in the preambles of Directive 2015/2436 and of Regulation 2017/1001. In this article, the author argues that, in the light of the EU legislation, conflicts between the freedom of expression and trade mark rights are often illusory. Indeed, in this debate we focus too quickly on the question of resolving a potential conflict, while EU trade mark law itself provides for limits that guarantee respect of the freedom of expression. It should also be borne in mind that commercial expressions enjoy a more restricted freedom since they serve private economic interests and not the interests of society as a whole. The freedom of commercial expression therefore needs to be limited by trade mark rights which are also fundamental rights, having equivalent value. Consequently, it seems unnecessary to envisage use related to the freedom of expression, of a sign reproducing or imitating a trade mark, as a specific limitation of trade mark rights, either in the speciality or in the field of enhanced protection of trade marks with a reputation.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference66 articles.

1. Alberini A (2015) L’exploitation de la renommée de la marque d’autrui. Du risque de confusion au risque d’association, CEDIDAC, Lausanne

2. Azéma J (2014) Usage de la dénomination dans son sens commun. Revue trimestrielle de droit commercial 4:795

3. Basire Y (2014) Les fonctions de la marque: essai sur la cohérence du régime juridique d’un signe distinctif. LexisNexis, Paris

4. Baud E, Colombet S (1998) La parodie de marque: vers une érosion du caractère absolu des signes distinctifs. Recueil Dalloz 23:227

5. Bohaczewski M (2015) Usage de nom comme contrefaçon de marque en droit de l’Union européenne. Les cahiers de propriété intellectuelle 27:61

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3