Funder
Institute of Education Sciences (IES), United States Department of Education
National Science Foundation (NSF), United States
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Theory and Mathematics,Education
Reference53 articles.
1. Berg, Ivd., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 341–356. doi:
10.1080/03075070600680836
,
http://tlc.zmml.uni-bremen.de/resource_files/resources/390/Design_principles_and_outcomes_of_peer_assessment_in_higher_education.pdf
.
2. Bland, J.M., & Altman, D.G. (2009). Analysis of continuous data from small samples. Bmj, 338, a3166.
3. Cho, K. (2008). Machine classification of peer comments in physics, In Baker, R.S.J.D., Barnes, T., & Beck, J.E. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 192–196). Canada: Montreal.
4. Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. doi:
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
,
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475209000747
, unravelling Peer Assessment.
5. Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73–84. doi:
10.1037/a0021950
.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献