Abstract
AbstractPersonalization in education describes instruction that is tailored to learners’ interests, attributes, or background and can be applied in various ways, one of which is through choice. In choice-based personalization, learners choose topics or resources that fit them the most. Personalization may be especially important (and under-used) with diverse learners, such as in a MOOC context. We report the impact of choice-based personalization on activity level, learning gains, and satisfaction in a Climate Science MOOC. The MOOC’s learning assignments had learners choose resources on climate-related issues in either their geographic locale (Personalized group) or in given regions (Generic group). 219 learners completed at least one of the two assignments. Over the entire course, personalization increased learners’ activity (number of course events), self-reported understanding of local issues, and self-reported likelihood to change climate-related habits. We found no differences on assignment completion rate, assignment length, and self-reported time-on-task. These results show that benefits of personalization extend beyond the original task and affect learners’ overall experience. We discuss design and implications of choice-based personalization, as well as opportunities for choice-based personalization at scale.
Funder
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Ministry of Aliyah and Immigrant Absorption
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Theory and Mathematics,Education
Reference47 articles.
1. Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2020). Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: A cause and effect decision-making model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(2), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09241-y.
2. Shukor, A., N., & Abdullah, Z. (2019). Using learning analytics to improve MOOC Instructional Design. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(24), 6. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12185.
3. Assami, S., Daoudi, N., & Ajhoun, R. (2018). Personalization criteria for enhancing learner engagement in MOOC platforms. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363375
4. Becker, K. (2006). How much choice is too much?. In Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 78–82).
5. Bernacki, M., & Walkington, C. (2014). The Impact of a Personalization Intervention for Mathematics on Learning and Non-Cognitive Factors. In Stamper, J., Pardos, Z., Mavrikis, M., McLaren, B.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining.