Embedding artificial intelligence in society: looking beyond the EU AI master plan using the culture cycle

Author:

Borsci SimoneORCID,Lehtola Ville V.ORCID,Nex FrancescoORCID,Yang Michael YingORCID,Augustijn Ellen-WienORCID,Bagheriye LeilaORCID,Brune ChristophORCID,Kounadi OuraniaORCID,Li JamyORCID,Moreira JoaoORCID,Van Der Nagel JoanneORCID,Veldkamp BernardORCID,Le Duc V.ORCID,Wang MingshuORCID,Wijnhoven FonsORCID,Wolterink Jelmer M.ORCID,Zurita-Milla RaulORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe European Union (EU) Commission’s whitepaper on Artificial Intelligence (AI) proposes shaping the emerging AI market so that it better reflects common European values. It is a master plan that builds upon the EU AI High-Level Expert Group guidelines. This article reviews the masterplan, from a culture cycle perspective, to reflect on its potential clashes with current societal, technical, and methodological constraints. We identify two main obstacles in the implementation of this plan: (i) the lack of a coherent EU vision to drive future decision-making processes at state and local levels and (ii) the lack of methods to support a sustainable diffusion of AI in our society. The lack of a coherent vision stems from not considering societal differences across the EU member states. We suggest that these differences may lead to a fractured market and an AI crisis in which different members of the EU will adopt nation-centric strategies to exploit AI, thus preventing the development of a frictionless market as envisaged by the EU. Moreover, the Commission aims at changing the AI development culture proposing a human-centred and safety-first perspective that is not supported by methodological advancements, thus taking the risks of unforeseen social and societal impacts of AI. We discuss potential societal, technical, and methodological gaps that should be filled to avoid the risks of developing AI systems at the expense of society. Our analysis results in the recommendation that the EU regulators and policymakers consider how to complement the EC programme with rules and compensatory mechanisms to avoid market fragmentation due to local and global ambitions. Moreover, regulators should go beyond the human-centred approach establishing a research agenda seeking answers to the technical and methodological open questions regarding the development and assessment of human-AI co-action aiming for a sustainable AI diffusion in the society.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Modeling AI Trust for 2050: perspectives from media and info-communication experts;AI & SOCIETY;2024-01-03

2. Embedding AI in society: ethics, policy, governance, and impacts;AI & SOCIETY;2023-06-24

3. Ciao AI: the Italian adaptation and validation of the Chatbot Usability Scale;Personal and Ubiquitous Computing;2023-06-01

4. What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research Landscape;Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2023-04-19

5. Digital twin of a city: Review of technology serving city needs;International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation;2022-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3