Abstract
AbstractThe rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the defence domain raises challenges for the ethical governance of these systems. A recent shift from the what to the how of AI ethics sees a nascent body of literature published by defence organisations focussed on guidance to implement AI ethics principles. These efforts have neglected a crucial intermediate step between principles and guidance concerning the elicitation of ethical requirements for specifying the guidance. In this article, we outline the key normative choices and corresponding tradeoffs that are involved in specifying guidance for the implementation of AI ethics principles in the defence domain. These correspond to: the AI lifecycle model used; the scope of stakeholder involvement; the accountability goals chosen; the choice of auditing requirements; and the choice of mechanisms for transparency and traceability. We provide initial recommendations for navigating these tradeoffs and highlight the importance of a pro-ethical institutional culture.
Funder
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Ada Lovelace Institute (2022) algorithmic impact assessment: a case study in healthcare. London: Ada Lovelace Institute. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Algorithmic-impact-assessment-a-case-study-in-healthcare.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2023
2. Alshammari M, Simpson A (2017) Towards a Principled Approach for Engineering Privacy by Design. In: Schweighofer E, Leitold H, Mitrakas A, Rannenberg K (eds) Privacy technologies and policy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10518. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67280-9_9
3. Aquin M, Troullinou P, O’Connor NE, Cullen A, Faller G, Holden L (2018) Towards an “Ethics by Design” methodology for AI research projects. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp 54–59. New Orleans LA USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278765.
4. Ayling J, Chapman A (2022) Putting AI ethics to work: are the tools fit for purpose? AI and Ethics 2(3):405–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00084-x
5. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2013) Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献