A values-based approach to designing military autonomous systems

Author:

Boshuijzen-van Burken ChristineORCID,Spruit Shannon,Geijsen Tom,Fillerup Lotte

Abstract

AbstractOur research is a value sensitive based approach to designing autonomous systems in a military context. Value sensitive design is an iterative process of conceptual, empirical and technical considerations. We enhance value sensitive design with Participatory Value Evaluation. This allows us to mine values of a large unorganized stakeholder group relevant to our context of research, namely Australian citizens. We found that value prioritizations differ depending on the context of use and that no one value fits all autonomous systems. General ethical frameworks can serve as high level guiding principles, but when it comes to actual technologies, a more nuanced and granulated approach to selecting and incorporating values is needed. Our research contributes to a greater awareness of the importance of inclusion of values in autonomous systems design in the context of defence. We suggest relevant frameworks and methods for values-based autonomous military systems design in the context of Australia, which may serve as a blueprint for other countries. Finally, we provide suggestions on how to operationalise values in systems design, as this is underrepresented in the current literature.

Funder

Trusted Autonomous Systems Defence CRC

University of New South Wales

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference64 articles.

1. AI Ethics Impact Group. 2020. From principles to practice. An interdisciplinary framework to operationalise AI ethics. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.bertelsmannstiftung. de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/WKIO_2020_final.pdf.

2. Australian Department of Defence. (2024). ADF Values and behaviours. Defence. https://www.defence.gov.au/about/who-we-are/values-behaviours

3. Blanchard, A., Thomas, C., & Taddeo, M. (2024). Ethical governance of artificial intelligence for defence: Normative tradeoffs for principle to practice guidance. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01866-7

4. Bode, I. (2023). Practice-based and public-deliberative normativity: Retaining human control over the use of force. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661231163392

5. Boshuijzen-van, B. C. (2023a). Value sensitive design for autonomous systems in defence—A primer. Journal for Ethics and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09687-w

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3