The relationship between the attitudes of the use of AI and diversity awareness: comparisons between Japan, the US, Germany, and South Korea

Author:

Ikkatai YukoORCID,Itatsu YukoORCID,Hartwig TilmanORCID,Noh Jooeun,Takanashi NaohiroORCID,Yaguchi YujinORCID,Hayashi KaoriORCID,Yokoyama Hiromi M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractRecent technological advances have accelerated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the world. Public concerns over AI in ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) may have been enhanced, but their awareness has not been fully examined between countries and cultures. We created four scenarios regarding the use of AI: “voice,” “recruiting,” “face,” and “immigration,” and compared public concerns in Japan, the US, Germany, and the Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea). Additionally, public ELSI concerns in respect of AI were measured using four items: ethics, tradition, law and social benefit. Respondents with AI knowledge tended to exhibit stronger concern about ELSI in various situations. In terms of law concerns, Japanese respondents displayed greater concerns. In contrast, the US, when compared Japan, expressed a relatively optimistic view of the current law landscape. Regarding social benefits, Korea, compared to Japan, exhibited a more positive outlook, whereas Germany, in comparison to Japan, expressed heightened concerns about it across different scenarios.

Funder

Soft Bank

The University of Tokyo

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference51 articles.

1. Access Now, European Digital Right (EDRi), Migration and Technology Monitor, the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), and Statewatch. 2021. Uses of AI in migration and border control: A fundamental rights approach to the Artificial Intelligence Act. https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Migration_2-pager-02052022-for-online.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2022.

2. Ahmed Z et al (2022) Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Pakistan: A cross-sectional online survey. Ann Med Surg 76:103493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103493

3. Antonenko P, Abramowitz B (2023) In-service teachers’ (mis)conceptions of artificial intelligence in K-12 science education. J Res Technol Educ 55:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2119450

4. BBC (2018) Amazon scrapped 'sexist AI' tool. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45809919. Accessed January 21, 2023.

5. Beduschi A (2021) International migration management in the age of artificial intelligence. Migr Stud 9(3):576–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaa003

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3