Abstract
AbstractAs MOOCs have become a standard format of online learning, it is increasingly important to design courses that fit the needs and contexts of the targeted learners. One way to do so is by actively designing with the subject experts, instructors, and other stakeholders. Within the context of designing MOOCs for disadvantaged groups in Southeast Asia, we explore the three-phase process of co-design. We present a graphical modeling language, CoDe-Graph, which can be used to facilitate the co-design process. We examine how diverse groups of experts provide feedback on design elements and create a common understanding using shared artifacts. Four case studies illustrate how the tool can be used by co-design teams to create and visualize custom MOOC designs.
Funder
Universität des Saarlandes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Allen, M. W. (2018). The successive approximation model (SAM): A closer look. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 42–51). Pearson.
2. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
3. Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835768
4. Barbera, E., Garcia, I., & Fuertes-Alpiste, M. (2017). A co-design process microanalysis: Stages and facilitators of an inquiry-based and technology-enhanced learning scenario. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(6), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2805
5. Bergenthum, R., Desel, J., Harrer, A., & Mauser, S. (2012). Modeling and mining of learnflows. In K. Jensen, S. Donatelli, & J. Kleijn (Eds.), Transactions on petri nets and other models of concurrency (pp. 22–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29072-5_2