Abstract
AbstractWhat, if anything, would be wrong with replacing the light postulate in Einstein’s 1905 formulation of special relativity with a ‘sound postulate’, stating that the speed of sound is independent of the speed of the source? After reviewing the historical reasons underlying the particular focus on light in the special theory, we consider the circumstances under which such a theory of ‘sonic relativity’ would be justified on empirical grounds. We then consider the philosophical upshots of ‘sonic relativity’ for four contemporary areas of investigation in the philosophy of spacetime: (i) global versus subsystem symmetries, (ii) dynamical versus geometrical approaches to spacetime, (iii) the possibility of a preferred frame in theories of quantum gravity, and (iv) spacetime functionalism.
Funder
John Templeton Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference67 articles.
1. Baker, D.J.: Knox’s inertial spacetime functionalism (and a better alternative). Synthese (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02598-z
2. Barbour, J.: The End of Time. Phoenix, London (1999)
3. Barbour, J.: Shape dynamics: an introduction. In: Proceedings of the Conference Quantum Field Theory and Gravity, Regensburg (2010)
4. Barceló, C., Carballo-Rubio, R., Garay, L.J., Jannes, G.: Electromagnetism as an emergent phenomenon: a step-by-step guide. New J. Phys. 16, 123028 (2014)
5. Barceló, C., Jannes, G.: A real Lorentz–FitzGerald contraction. Found. Phys. 38, 191–199 (2008)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献