Surgical techniques for medial Patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of level I and II studies

Author:

Kahlon Harjind1,Vivekanantha Prushoth2,Blackman Benjamin3,Cohen Dan4,Mckechnie Tyler5,Park Lily5,de SA Darren4

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

2. Michael DeGroote School of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

3. Department of Medicine, Department of Surgery University of Limerick Limerick Ireland

4. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery McMaster University Medical Centre 1200 Main St West 4E14L8N 3Z5 Hamilton ON Canada

5. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery McMaster University Medical Centre Hamilton ON Canada

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo determine the most optimal surgical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR).MethodsThree databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 13th, 2022, for level I or II studies comparing MPFLR techniques. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R‐AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on patient‐reported outcome measures were recorded. Quality assessment was carried out using the MINORS and Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tools. Certainty of evidence was carried out with the GRADE assessment tool.ResultsTen studies comprising 723 patients (723 knees) were included in this review. The weighted mean difference in Kujala, Lysholm, and IKDC scores comparing single‐ and double‐tunnel patellar drilling techniques was 2.66 (95% CI −1.05–6.37, p = 0.16, I2 = 0%) with moderate certainty, 0.78 (95% CI −9.02–10.58, p = 0.88, I2 = 87%) with low certainty, and 1.71 (95% CI −2.43–5.86, p = 0.42, I2 = 0%) with low certainty, respectively. Double‐suture anchor patellar fixation demonstrated greater Kujala scores than transpatellar fixation (87.1 ± 2.8 vs 84.0 ± 3.8, p < 0.001) with moderate certainty. Y‐shaped graft patellar fixation demonstrated superior Kujala scores to C‐shaped graft patellar fixation (95.9 ± 4.7 vs 91.3 ± 9.7, p = 0.001) with moderate certainty. Augmentation of femoral fixation with polyester sutures demonstrated superior Kujala scores (97.8 ± 6.4. vs 88.0 ± 6.3, p < 0.005) with low certainty. Four‐stranded grafts demonstrated greater Kujala scores than two‐stranded grafts (93.5 ± 2.6 vs 91.6 ± 3.5, p = 0.01) with low certainty.ConclusionThe optimal MPFLR surgical technique is likely to utilize a four‐stranded graft using either endobutton, double‐suture anchor, or transosseous suture patellar fixation with polyester suture augmented interference screw femoral fixation. Orthopedic surgeons can consider employing such a technique to improve patient outcomes by conferring greater graft stability, strength, and function.Level of evidence Level II.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3