Nonanatomical femoral tunnel positioning in isolated MPFL reconstruction is not associated with an increased risk of patellofemoral osteoarthritis after a minimum follow‐up of 10 years

Author:

Erard Julien1ORCID,Olivier Joris12ORCID,Gunst Stanislas1,Shatrov Jobe13,Batailler Cécile14,Lustig Sébastien14,Servien Elvire15

Affiliation:

1. Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix‐Rousse Hospital Lyon University Hospital Lyon France

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Centre Hospitalier Bois de l'Abbaye Seraing Liège Belgium

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Sydney Adventist Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University Université de Lyon Lyon France

5. LIBM—EA 7424, Interuniversity Laboratory of Biology of Mobility Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University Lyon France

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe association between the prevalence of patellofemoral arthritis (PFA) and femoral tunnel positioning following isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) has not been well described. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between femoral tunnel positioning and the prevalence of PFA.MethodsThis was a single‐centre study of patients undergoing an isolated MPFLr between 2006 and 2011 with a minimum of 10 years of follow‐up. Outcomes assessed were the presence of PFA on radiographs, recurrence of instability requiring revision surgery and patient‐reported outcomes, including Kujala, Tegner and IKDC scores. Tunnel positioning was assessed on postoperative radiographs using two radiographic methods: Schöttle's point and the grid method to localise the femoral tunnel. Patients were grouped based on tunnel positioning and compared.ResultsFifty patients were analysed at a mean follow‐up of 12.4 years. Thirty‐three patients (66%) had a femoral tunnel position within 7 mm of Schöttle's point and 39 (78%) within the anatomic quadrant, with the most common location according to the grid method in D4 (28%) and E4 (26%), respectively. Thirty‐seven patients (74%) had a satisfactory (>80 versus <80) Kujala score at long‐term follow‐up. None of the examined tunnel assessment methods demonstrated a significant relationship with Tegner, Kujala or International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Patients with a femoral tunnel position >7 mm outside Schöttle's point or were considered to be in a nonanatomic position were not significantly more likely to result in unsatisfactory Kujala scores at the last follow‐up. Tunnel positioning and the other tested parameters were not found to be significantly associated with the development of PFA.ConclusionNo correlation between femoral tunnel position and risk of PFA or poor outcomes was observed in patients undergoing isolated MPFLr at long‐term follow‐up. The impact of femoral tunnel placement on long‐term outcomes in patients with PFI may be less significant than originally considered.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3