Abstract
AbstractPolygenic risk scores (PRS) have the potential to improve the accuracy of clinical risk assessments, yet questions about their clinical validity and readiness for clinical implementation persist. Understanding how individuals integrate and act on the information provided by PRS is critical for their effective integration into routine clinical care, yet few studies have examined how individuals respond to the receipt of polygenic risk information. We conducted an embedded Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) study to examine if and how unaffected participants in a US population breast cancer screening trial understood and utilized PRS, as part of a multifactorial risk score combining traditional risk factors with a genetic risk assessment, to make screening and risk-reduction decisions. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 trial participants who were designated at elevated risk for breast cancer due to their combined risk score. Interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Participants understood PRS conceptually and accepted it as one of many risk factors to consider, yet the value and meaning they ascribed to this risk estimate varied. Most participants reported financial and insurance barriers to enhanced screening with MRI and were not interested in taking risk-reducing medications. These findings contribute to our understanding of how PRS may be best translated from research to clinical care. Furthermore, they illuminate ethical concerns about identifying risk and making recommendations based on polygenic risk in a population screening context where many may have trouble accessing appropriate care.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology
Reference51 articles.
1. Adeyemo A, Balaconis MK, Darnes DR, Fatumo S, Granados Moreno P, Hodonsky CJ, Inouye M, Kanai M, Kato K, Knoppers BM, Lewis ACF, Martin AR, McCarthy MI, Meyer MN, Okada Y, Richards JB, Richter L, Ripatti S, Rotimi CN, … Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance (2021) Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat Med 27(11):1876–1884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01549-6
2. Ambry Genetics (2020a) AmbryScore for Breast Cancer. https://www.ambrygen.com/clinician/ambryscore/breast. Accessed 21 Sept 2022
3. Arvanitis M, Cainzos-Achirica M (2022) The road toward clinical implementation of polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease∗. JACC Adv 1(3):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100071
4. ATLAS.ti (2022) https://atlasti.com/?x-clickref=1011lwneNxgx. Accessed 21 Sept 2022
5. BCSC Breast Cancer Risk Calculator (n.d.) Retrieved October 3, 2020, from https://tools.bcsc-scc.org/BC5yearRisk/calculator.htm. Accessed 21 Sept 2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献