Inside school turnaround: What drives success?

Author:

Hill Kirsten LeeORCID,Desimone Laura,Wolford Tonya,Reitano Adrienne,Porter Andrew

Abstract

AbstractThis study proposes an empirically grounded theory of how school reform implementation relates to effectiveness, useful for developing and studying many approaches to school reform both in the U.S. and abroad, and also for assessing how policymakers and implementers might leverage various aspects of implementation to create effective school improvement models at scale. Guided by a new framework that links Bryk and colleagues’ (2010) five essential supports and as reported by Desimone’s (2002) adaptation of Porter and colleagues’ (1986) policy attributes theory, we use a mixed-methods approach to study the implementation and effectiveness of school turnaround efforts in the School District of Philadelphia. We explore the relationships among key turnaround model components, approaches to model implementation, and academic achievement using a matched comparison design and estimating a series of regressions. Qualitative methods are used to contextualize findings and offer explanatory hypotheses.

Funder

Institute of Education Sciences

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference82 articles.

1. American Institutes for Research. (2011). School turnaround pocket guide. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/resource/school-turnaround-pocket-guide

2. Ayers, J., Owen, I., Partee, G., & Chang, T. (2012). No child left behind waivers: Promising ideas from second round applications. Center for American Progress.

3. Babyak, M. A. (2004). What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(3), 411–421.

4. Berends, M. (2000). Teacher-reported effects of new American school designs: Exploring relationships to teacher background and school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 65–82.

5. Bower, J. (2015). Assessment and measurement are not the same thing. Retrieved from http://www.joebower.org/2015/12/assessment-and-measurement-are-not-same.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3