Abstract
AbstractExternal preference mapping is widely used in marketing and R&D divisions to understand the consumer behaviour. The most common preference map is obtained through a two-step procedure that combines principal component analysis and least squares regression. The standard approach exploits classical regression and therefore focuses on the conditional mean. This paper proposes the use of quantile regression to enrich the preference map looking at the whole distribution of the consumer preference. The enriched maps highlight possible different consumer behaviour with respect to the less or most preferred products. This is pursued by exploring the variability of liking along the principal components as well as focusing on the direction of preference. The use of different aesthetics (colours, shapes, size, arrows) equips standard preference map with additional information and does not force the user to change the standard tool she/he is used to. The proposed methodology is shown in action on a case study pertaining yogurt preferences.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation,Statistics and Probability,Analysis
Reference32 articles.
1. Berget, I., Bech, S., Giacalone, D., Moulin, S., Pedersen, M.E., Varela, P., Næs, T.: Sound quality perception of loudspeakers evaluated by different sensory descriptive methods and preference mapping. J. Sens. Stud. 36(1), e12620 (2021)
2. Buchinsky, M.: Estimating the asymptotic covariance matrix for quantile regression models a Monte Carlo study. J. Econom. 68(2), 303–338 (1995)
3. Davino, C., Furno, M., Vistocco, D.: Quantile regression: Theory and applications. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New Jersey (2013)
4. Davino, C., Romano, R., Næs, T.: The use of quantile regression in consumer studies. Food Qual. Prefer. 40, 230–239 (2015)
5. Davino, C., Romano, R., Vistocco, D.: Modelling drivers of consumer liking handling consumer and product effects. Ital. J. Appl. Stat. 30, 359–372 (2018)