Abstract
Abstract
Drooling, or sialorrhea, is a common condition in patients with cerebral palsy, rare diseases, and neurodevelopmental disorders. The goal of this review was to identify the different properties of sialorrhea outcome measures in children. Four databases were analysed in search of sialorrhea measurement tools, and the review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used for quality appraisal of the outcome measures. The initial search yielded 891 articles, 430 of which were duplicates. Thus, 461 full-text articles were evaluated. Among these, 21 met the inclusion criteria, reporting 19 different outcome measures that encompassed both quantitative measures and parent/proxy questionnaires. Conclusions: Among the outcome measures found through this review, the 5-min Drooling Quotient can objectively discriminate sialorrhea frequency in patients with developmental disabilities. The Drooling Impact Scale can be used to evaluate changes after treatment. The modified drooling questionnaire can measure sialorrhea severity and its social acceptability. To date, the tests proposed in this review are the only tools displaying adequate measurement properties. The acquisition of new data about reliability, validity, and responsiveness of these tests will confirm our findings.
What is Known:• Although sialorrhea is a recognized problem in children with disabilities, especially those with cerebral palsy (CP), there is a lack of confidence among physicians in measuring sialorrhea.
What is New:• Few sialorrhea measures are available for clinicians that may guide decision-making and at the same time have strong evidence to provide confidence in the results.• A combination of both quantitative measures and parent/proxy questionnaires might provide an adequate measurement of sialorrhea in children.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference40 articles.
1. Blasco PA, Allaire JH (1992) Drooling in the developmentally disabled: management practices and recommendations. Dev Med Child Neurol 34:849–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb11382.x
2. Poling A, Miller K, Nelson N, Ryan C (1978) Reduction of undesired classroom behavior by systematically reinforcing the absence of such behavior. Educ Treat Child 1(3):35–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42898421. Accessed 1 July 2021
3. Lancioni GE, Coninx F, Manders N, Driessen M (1989) Use of automatic cueing to reduce drooling in two multihandicapped students. Journal of the Multihandicapped Person 2:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90008-6
4. Brodsky L (1993) Drooling in children. In: Arvedson JC, Brodsky L (eds) Pediatric Swallowing and Feeding. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, pp 389–416
5. Kay S, Harchik AE, Luiselli JK (2006) Elimination of drooling by an adolescent student with autism attending public high school. J Posit Behav Interv 8:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080010401
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献