Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Anterior drooling is a common comorbidity in children and young people (CYP) with neurodevelopmental disabilities. This study aimed to assess the social and emotional impact of drooling in CYP with a developmental age (DA) of 6 years and older, in whom this impact may differ from those with a lower DA due to their developing sense of self and awareness of their position within social groups.
Methods
Questionnaire data collected for routine clinical care were used to assess parental perceptions of the impact of drooling on (1) social interaction; (2) satisfaction with social interaction, appearance, family relations and life in general and (3) the way CYP expressed feelings on appearance, acceptance by peers and acceptance by adults. Fisher’s exact tests and Mann–Whitney U tests were applied to identify associations between clinical characteristics and the social and emotional impact of drooling.
Results
Seventy-nine CYP with an estimated DA ≥ 6 years were included. The majority experienced frequent to constant (83%) and profuse (61%) drooling. Drooling frequently compromised social interaction with peers (49%) and adults (28%), and cognitive abilities were underestimated in 40%. Dissatisfaction with physical appearance (25%) related to drooling was noted. One-fifth of CYP reportedly expressed negative feelings on acceptance by peers related to drooling.
Conclusions: These findings underscore the substantial impact of drooling on CYP with a DA of 6 years and older, primarily through avoidance by peers and underestimated cognitive abilities, emphasizing that recognizing and addressing these social-emotional consequences should be integral to clinical care.
What is Known:• Anterior drooling is common among children and youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.
What is New:• There seems to be a heightened prevalence of impaired social interaction with peers and underestimation of cognitive abilities due to drooling among children with a developmental age of at least 6 years compared to previous studies with more heterogeneous populations.• The impact of drooling can extend to domains that affect self-esteem, although this may not be fully captured with standardized questions, requiring clinicians to address these consequences in a way that is tailored to the child’s experiences.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Blasco PA, Allaire JH (1992) Drooling in the developmentally disabled: management practices and recommendations. Dev Med Child Neurol 34(10):849–62
2. van Hulst K, van den Engel-Hoek L, Geurts ACH, Jongerius PH, van der Burg JJW, Feuth T et al (2018) Development of the Drooling Infants and Preschoolers Scale (DRIPS) and reference charts for monitoring saliva control in children aged 0–4 years. Infant Behav Dev 50:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.01.004
3. Speyer R, Cordier R, Kim JH, Cocks N, Michou E, Wilkes-Gillan S (2019) Prevalence of drooling, swallowing, and feeding problems in cerebral palsy across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Dev Med Child Neurol 61(11):1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14316
4. Glader L, Delsing C, Hughes A, Parr J, Pennington L, Reddihough D et al (2017) AACPDM Care Pathway for sialorrhea in Cerebral Palsy [updated June 2018]. Available from: http://www.aacpdm.org/publications/care-pathways/sialorrhea.
5. Orriëns LB, de Groot SAF, van der Burg JJW, van den Hoogen FJA, van Hulst K, Erasmus CE (2024) Interdisciplinary assessment and treatment of paediatric drooling: two decades of experience by the Nijmegen saliva control team reflected in a stepwise algorithm. Eur J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05658-5