Abstract
AbstractChildren with sickle cell disease (SCD) face various healthcare choices to be made during the disease process that may impact their lives. Shared decision-making (SDM) could improve their health outcomes. We assessed if, and to what extent, paediatricians engage children with SCD and/or their parents in the decision-making process. In this observational cross-sectional study, paediatric SCD patients and their parents visiting the outpatient paediatrics clinic of a university hospital participated in a SDM baseline measurement. Two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from the audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument, a 0–20-point scale from which scores are usually expressed as a percentage of ideal SDM. The level of SDM, as perceived by patients, parents and paediatricians, was appreciated using the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires, respectively. Scores could range from 0% (no SDM) to 100% (exemplary SDM). Twenty-four consultations in which a decision needed to be made about SCD treatment were audiotaped and analysed; six were from each paediatrician. The group consisted of 17 male and 7 female patients from various cultural backgrounds between 2 and 17 years old, with a mean age of 9.4 years (SD 4.2). Median OPTION-5 scores were 25.0% [IQR] 20.0–40.0%; range 0–55%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 56.7% (IQR 39.4–88.9%) and 68.9% (IQR 57.8–77.8%), respectively.Conclusion: Although subjective scores of SDM were fair, the objectively scored level of SDM among children suffering from SCD leaves room for improvement. This may be realized by increasing knowledge about the benefits of SDM, child-centred SDM interventions and SDM-training for paediatricians that takes into account the complexity of intercultural challenges and risk communication between stakeholders.
What is Known:• Children that suffer from sickle cell disease (SCD) are more vulnerable to factors that negatively impact the care that they receive as well as suboptimal health outcomes.• Shared decision-making (SDM) can help children participate in a collaborative decision-making process about their preferred treatment options and improve their health outcomes.
What is New:• The level of participation in the decision-making process for patients suffering from SCD and the families that they belong to leaves room for improvement. The impact of intercultural challenges and the quality and consistency of risk-communication between stakeholders in paediatric SDM needs further exploration.• Paediatricians are more confident about their ability to involve the child and parents compared to how children and their parents experience their level of involvement in a shared decision-making process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference47 articles.
1. Legare F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID et al (2018) Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD006732
2. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R (2003) Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 12(2):93–99
3. Wyatt KD, List B, Brinkman WB, Prutsky Lopez G, Asi N, Erwin P et al (2015) Shared decision making in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Pediatr 15(6):573–583
4. Feenstra B, Boland L, Lawson ML, Harrison D, Kryworuchko J, Leblanc M et al (2014) Interventions to support children’s engagement in health-related decisions: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 14:109
5. Sisk BA, DuBois J, Kodish E, Wolfe J, Feudtner C (2017) Navigating decisional discord: the pediatrician’s role when child and parents disagree. Pediatrics 139(6):e20170234. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0234 (Epub 2017 May 12. PMID: 28562285; PMCID: PMC5470498)