Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) is recognised as challenging, and well-designed programs can have differing levels of success depending on implementation quality. The aim of this review was to summarise the evidence for implementation of IPE, and identify challenges and key lessons to guide faculty in IPE implementation.
Methods
Five stage scoping review of methodological characteristics, implementation components, challenges and key lessons in primary studies in IPE. Thematic analysis using a framework of micro (teaching), meso (institutional), and macro (systemic) level education factors was used to synthesise challenges and key lessons.
Results
Twenty-seven primary studies were included in this review. Studies were predominantly descriptive in design and implementation components inconsistently reported. IPE was mostly integrated into curricula, optional, involved group learning, and used combinations of interactive and didactic approaches. Micro level implementation factors (socialisation issues, learning context, and faculty development), meso level implementation factors (leadership and resources, administrative processes), and macro level implementation factors (education system, government policies, social and cultural values) were extrapolated. Sustainability was identified as an additional factor in IPE implementation.
Conclusion
Lack of complete detailed reporting limits evidence of IPE implementation, however, this review highlighted challenges and yielded key lessons to guide faculty in the implementation of IPE.
Funder
University of the Sunshine Coast
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference64 articles.
1. Acquavita, S. P., Lewis, M. A., Aparicio, E., & Pecukonis, E. (2014). Student perspectives on interprofessional education and experiences (Review). Journal of Allied Health, 43(2), e31–e36.
2. Anderson, E. S., Cox, D., & Thorpe, L. N. (2009). Preparation of educators involved in interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802565106.
3. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
4. Burns, T., & Schuller, T. (2007). The evidence agenda. In Evidence in education: Linking research and policy (pp. 15–32). Paris: OECD Publishing.
5. Caldwell, L., Younker, A., Wegner, L., Patrick, M., Vergnani, T., Smith, E., et al. (2008). Understanding leisure-related program effects by using process data in the healthwise south africa project. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2008.26-146.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献