Which Prior Mathematical Knowledge Is Necessary for Study Success in the University Study Entrance Phase? Results on a New Model of Knowledge Levels Based on a Reanalysis of Data from Existing Studies

Author:

Rach Stefanie,Ufer Stefan

Abstract

AbstractThe transition from school to tertiary mathematics courses, which involve advanced mathematics, is a challenge for many students. Prior research has established the central role of prior mathematical knowledge for successfully dealing with challenges in learning processes during the study entrance phase. However, beyond knowing that more prior knowledge is beneficial for study success, especially passing courses, it is not yet known how a level of prior knowledge can be characterized that is sufficient for a successful start into a mathematics program. The aim of this contribution is to specify the appropriate level of mathematical knowledge that predicts study success in the first semester. Based on theoretical analysis of the demands in tertiary mathematics courses, we develop a mathematical test with 17 items in the domain of Analysis. Thereby, we focus on different levels of conceptual understanding by linking between different (in)formal representation formats and different levels of mathematical argumentations. The empirical results are based on a re-analysis of five studies in which in sum 1553 students of bachelor mathematics and mathematics teacher education programs deal with some of these items in each case. By identifying four levels of knowledge, we indicate that linking multiple representations is an important skill at the study entrance phase. With these levels of knowledge, it might be possible to identify students at risk of failing. So, the findings could contribute to more precise study advice and support before and while studying advanced mathematics at university.

Funder

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Engineering

Reference87 articles.

1. Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2002). Definitions: Dealing with categories mathematically. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 28–34.

2. Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2005). Convergence of sequences and series 2: Interactions between visual reasoning and the learner's beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 77–100.

3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

4. Artigue, M. (1999). The teaching and learning of mathematics at the university level. Crucial questions for contemporary research in education. Notices of the AMS, 46(11), 1377–1385.

5. Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(4), 487–500.

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3