Author:
Rach Stefanie,Ufer Stefan
Abstract
AbstractThe transition from school to tertiary mathematics courses, which involve advanced mathematics, is a challenge for many students. Prior research has established the central role of prior mathematical knowledge for successfully dealing with challenges in learning processes during the study entrance phase. However, beyond knowing that more prior knowledge is beneficial for study success, especially passing courses, it is not yet known how a level of prior knowledge can be characterized that is sufficient for a successful start into a mathematics program. The aim of this contribution is to specify the appropriate level of mathematical knowledge that predicts study success in the first semester. Based on theoretical analysis of the demands in tertiary mathematics courses, we develop a mathematical test with 17 items in the domain of Analysis. Thereby, we focus on different levels of conceptual understanding by linking between different (in)formal representation formats and different levels of mathematical argumentations. The empirical results are based on a re-analysis of five studies in which in sum 1553 students of bachelor mathematics and mathematics teacher education programs deal with some of these items in each case. By identifying four levels of knowledge, we indicate that linking multiple representations is an important skill at the study entrance phase. With these levels of knowledge, it might be possible to identify students at risk of failing. So, the findings could contribute to more precise study advice and support before and while studying advanced mathematics at university.
Funder
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2002). Definitions: Dealing with categories mathematically. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 28–34.
2. Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2005). Convergence of sequences and series 2: Interactions between visual reasoning and the learner's beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 77–100.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Artigue, M. (1999). The teaching and learning of mathematics at the university level. Crucial questions for contemporary research in education. Notices of the AMS, 46(11), 1377–1385.
5. Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(4), 487–500.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献