Naive Modus Ponens and Failure of Transitivity-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Naive Modus Ponens and Failure of Transitivity

Published:2015-02-24 Issue:1 Volume:45 Page:65-72
ISSN:0022-3611
Container-title:Journal of Philosophical Logic
language:en
Short-container-title:J Philos Logic

Author:

Fjellstad Andreas

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10992-015-9351-0.pdf

Reference13 articles.

1. Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., van Rooij, R. (2012). Tolerant, classical, strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, 347–385.

2. Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., van Rooij, R (2015). Vagueness, truth and permissive consequence. In T. Achourioti, H. Galinon, K. Fujimoto, J. Martínez-Fernández (Eds.), Unifying the philosophy of truth. New York: Springer.

3. Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., van Rooij, R. (2013). Reaching transparent truth. Mind, 122, 851–866.

4. Cook, R. (2014). There is No Paradox of Logical Validity. Logica Universalis, 5, 1–21.

5. Humberstone, L. (2010). Smiley’s distinction between rules of inference and rules of proof. In T.J. Smiley, J. Lear, A. Oliver (Eds.), The force of argument: Essays in honor of Timothy Smiley. New York: Routledge.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Strong Kleene Metainferential Logics;Trends in Logic;2023

2. Deep ST;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2021-11-20

3. Metasequents and Tetravaluations;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2021-08-25

4. The Dialogical Roots of Deduction;2020-12-10

5. Las soluciones subestructurales a las paradojas y el problema de la dependencia;Análisis Filosófico;2020-05-01