Author:
Quiohilag Katherine,Caie Peter,Oniscu Anca,Brenn Thomas,Harrison David
Abstract
AbstractOverlapping histological features between benign and malignant lesions and a lack of firm diagnostic criteria for malignancy result in high rates of inter-observer variation in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. We aimed to investigate the differential expression of five miRNAs (21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211) in benign naevi (n = 42), dysplastic naevi (n = 41), melanoma in situ (n = 42), and melanoma (n = 42) and evaluate their potential as diagnostic biomarkers of melanocytic lesions. Real-time PCR showed differential miRNA expression profiles between benign naevi; dysplastic naevi and melanoma in situ; and invasive melanoma. We applied a random forest machine learning algorithm to classify cases based on their miRNA expression profiles, which resulted in a ROC curve analysis of 0.99 for malignant melanoma and greater than 0.9 for all other groups. This indicates an overall very high accuracy of our panel of miRNAs as a diagnostic biomarker of benign, dysplastic, and malignant melanocytic lesions. However, the impact of variable lesion percentage and spatial expression patterns of miRNAs on these real-time PCR results was also considered. In situ hybridisation confirmed the expression of miRNA 21 and 211 in melanocytes, while demonstrating expression of miRNA 205 only in keratinocytes, thus calling into question its value as a biomarker of melanocytic lesions. In conclusion, we have validated some miRNAs, including miRNA 21 and 211, as potential diagnostic biomarkers of benign, dysplastic, and malignant melanocytic lesions. However, we also highlight the crucial importance of considering tissue morphology and spatial expression patterns when using molecular techniques for the discovery and validation of new biomarkers.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Skin Cancer Statistics 2017 [http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/skin-cancer]
2. Brenn T. Pitfalls in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions. Oxford, UK2012. p. 690–705
3. Urso C, Rongioletti F, Innocenzi D, Batolo D, Chimenti S, Fanti PL, Filotico R, Gianotti R, Lentini M, Tomasini C, Pippione M (2005) Histological features used in the diagnosis of melanoma are frequently found in benign melanocytic naevi. J Clin Pathol 58(4):409–412
4. Brochez L, Verhaeghe E, Grosshans E, Haneke E, Piérard G, Ruiter D, Naeyaert JM (2002) Inter-observer variation in the histopathological diagnosis of clinically suspicious pigmented skin lesions. J Pathol 196(4):459–466
5. Lyn MD, Marianne B, Jan AB, Byers HR, Martin CM, Raymond LB (1993) Histopathologic recognition and grading of dysplastic melanocytic nevi: an Interobserver agreement study. J Investig Dermatol 100(3s):318S
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献