Abstract
AbstractRemotely operating vehicles utilize the benefits of vehicle automation when fully automated driving is not yet possible. A human operator ensures safety and availability from afar and supports the vehicle automation when its capabilities are exceeded. The remote operator, conceptualized as remote assistant, fulfills the legal requirements in Germany as a Technical Supervisor to operate highly automated vehicles at Society of Automotive Engineers 4. To integrate the remote operator into the automated driving system, a novel user-centered human–machine interface (HMI) for a remote assistant’s workplace was developed and initially evaluated. The insights gained in this process were incorporated into the design of a workplace prototype for remote assistance. This prototype was tested in the study reported here by 34 participants meeting the professional background criteria for the role of Technical Supervisor according to the German law. Typical scenarios that may occur in highly automated driving and require remote assistance were created in a simulation environment. Even under elevated cognitive load induced by simultaneously engaging in a secondary task, participants were able to obtain sufficient situation awareness and quickly resolve the scenarios. The HMI also yielded favorable usability and acceptance ratings. The results of this study inform the iterative workplace development and further research on the remote assistance of highly automated vehicles.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Economics and Climate Protection
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Abbink DA, Carlson T, Mulder M, de Winter JCF, Aminravan F, Gibo TL, Boer ER (2018) A topology of shared control systems—finding common ground in diversity. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst 48(5):509–525. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2791570
2. Amador O, Aramrattana M, Vinel A (2022) A survey on remote operation of road vehicles. IEEE Access 10:130135–130154. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3229168
3. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Human-Comput Interact 24(6):574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
4. Barrett BT, Cruickshank AG, Flavell JC, Bennett SJ, Buckley JG, Harris JM, Scally AJ (2020) Faster visual reaction times in elite athletes are not linked to better gaze stability. Sci Rep 10(1):13216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69975-z
5. Baumann M, Petzoldt T, Groenewoud C, Hogema K (2008) The effect of cognitive tasks on predicting events in traffic. In: C. Brusque (Ed) Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Interface Design for Intelligent Transport Systems. Humanist Publications. https://www.humanist-vce.eu/fileadmin/contributeurs/humanist/Lyon2008/Proceedings-HUMANIST-S1.1.pdf. Accessed on Sep 2023
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献