Work domain modeling of human-automation interaction for in-vehicle automation

Author:

Zhang You,Lintern GavanORCID

Abstract

AbstractAutomated driving systems are deployed on public roads with little empirical support for the dominant justifications of enhanced safety and enhanced productivity. Furthermore, development of automated driving systems has been piecemeal rather than systematic while research on driver-automation interaction has relied on individual analysis of accidents and on observational studies of driving behavior in a simulator or on the road. In this paper, we apply Work Domain Analysis to develop a more systematic and comprehensive model of automated driving. We use a strategy of layering the driving automation onto the resulting Abstraction-Decomposition Space for manual driving to mimic the existing design strategy of introducing automation to take over driving functions previously the responsibility of the human driver. Our analysis shows that automation does not unequivocally supports dominant driving values. Furthermore, our analysis revealed subtle interdependencies between human and technological functions. We conclude that an Abstraction Decomposition Space offers a systematic view of driver-automation interaction that can suggest new insights for automation design.

Funder

Monash University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Banks VA, Eriksson A, O’Donoghue J, Stanton NA (2018) Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study. Appl Ergon 68:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.010

2. Blanco M, Atwood J, Vasquez HM, Trimble TE, Fitchett VL, Radlbeck J, Morgan JF (2015) Human factors evaluation of level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC

3. Blumenthal M, Laura Fraade-Blanar (2020) Can Automated vehicles prove themselves to be safe. Issues Sci Technol 36(4):71–80

4. Burns CM, Bryant DJ, Chalmers BA (2001) Scenario mapping with work domain analysis. Proc Human Factors Ergonomics So Ann Meeting 45(4):424–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120104500434

5. Cadillac (2020) 2020-cadillac-ct6-owners-manual. General motors LLC. https://ownermanualbook.com/2020-cadillac-ct6-owners-manual/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3