Abstract
AbstractMultiteam systems (MTSs) are comprised of two or more interconnected teams working toward shared superordinate goals but with unique sub-goals. To date, research has predominantly focused on how decisions are made and has viewed these cognitive processes as occurring within individuals. However, for MTSs operating in extreme environments such as disasters, it is often not a question of how decisions are made, but what is causing delays and failures to make decisions. To understand the causes of decision delay within these complex networks, it is important to focus on decision processes at the multiteam level. Using naturalistic observational and interview data collected during a multi-site, multiteam emergency response to a large-scale disaster exercise, this study examines both information sharing (what was shared, with whom, how long this took), and decision processes across teams (situational awareness—SA, plan formulation, and plan execution). Findings demonstrate that interdependencies in cognitive processes exist across individuals where goals overlap. Decision delay is not only caused by failure to develop SA within a team preventing their ability to formulate and execute plans but also by the inability of other teams to execute their plans. The implications of these findings for developing targeted interventions are discussed.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy
Reference78 articles.
1. Alison L, Power N, van den Heuvel C, Humann M, Palasinksi M, Crego J (2015) Decision inertia: deciding between least-worst outcomes in emergency responses to disasters. J Occup Organ Psychol 88(2):295–321
2. Alison L, van den Heuvel C, Waring S, Power N, Long A, O’Hara T, Crego J (2013) Immersive simulated learning environments for researching critical incidents. A knowledge synthesis of the literature and experiences of studying high-risk strategic decision making. J Cogn Eng Decis Making 7(3):255–272
3. Bales RF, Strodtbeck FL (1951) Phases in group problem solving. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 46:485–495
4. Berggren P, Johansson BJE, Baroutsi N, Turcotte I, Tremblay S (2014) Assessing team focused behaviors in emergency response teams using the shared priorities measure. In: Proceedings of the 11th ISCRAM. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
5. Bharosa N, Lee J, Janssen M (2010) Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: propositions from field exercises. Inf Syst Front 12:49–65
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献