1. Batterman, R. W. (2000). A ‘modern’ (= Victorian?) attitude towards scientific understanding. Monist,
83(2), 228–257.
2. Batterman, R. W. (2002). The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction and emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Batterman, R. W. (2013). The Tyrrany of Scales. In R. W. Batterman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of physics (pp. 255–286). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Braverman, M., Clevenger, J., Harmon, I., Higgins, A., et al. (2012). Intelligibility is necessary for scientific explanation, but accuracy may not be. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. Cooper (Eds.), 34th Annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2012 (CogSci 2012): Building bridges across cognitive sciences around the world. Sapporo, Japan, 1–4 August 2012 (Vol. 1, pp. 1368–1373). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
5. Cohen, L. J. (1992). An essay on belief and acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.