Author:
Vértes Miklós,Nguyen Dat T.,Székely György,Bérczi Ákos,Dósa Edit
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In the absence of literature data, we aimed to determine the long-term patency rates of middle/distal common carotid artery (CCA) stenting and to investigate predisposing factors in the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR).
Materials and Methods
Fifty-one patients (30 males, median age 63.5 years), who underwent stenting with 51 self-expandable stents for significant (≥ 60%) stenosis of the middle/distal CCA, were analyzed retrospectively. Patient (atherosclerotic risk factors, comorbidities, medications), vessel (elongation), lesion (stenosis grade, length, calcification, location), and stent characteristics (material, diameter, length, fracture) were examined. Duplex ultrasonography was used to monitor stent patency. The Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests, Kaplan–Meier analyses, and a log-rank test were used statistically.
Results
The median follow-up time was 35 months (interquartile range, 20–102 months). Significant (≥ 70%) ISR developed in 14 patients (27.5%; stenosis, N = 10; entire CCA occlusion, N = 4). Primary patency rates were 98%, 92%, 83%, 73%, and 61% at 6, 12, 24, 60, and 96 months, respectively. Reintervention was performed in six patients (11.8%) with nonocclusive ISR. Secondary patency rates were 100% at 6 and 12 months and 96% at 24, 60, and 96 months. In-stent restenosis developed more frequently (P < .001) in patients with hyperlipidemia; primary patency rates were also significantly worse (Chi-square, 11.08; degrees of freedom, 1; P < .001) in patients with hyperlipidemia compared to those without.
Conclusion
Stenting of the middle/distal CCA can be performed with acceptable patency rates. If intervention is unequivocally needed, patients with hyperlipidemia will require closer follow-up care.
Level of Evidence
Level 3, Local non-random sample.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference39 articles.
1. Bonati LH, Brown MM. Carotid artery disease. In: Grotta JC, Albers GW, Broderick JP, Kasner SE, Lo EH, Mendelow AD, Sacco RL, Wong LKS, editors. Stroke: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Amsterdam: Elsevier—Health Sciences Division; 2016. p. 326.
2. Qaja E, Tadi P, Theetha Kariyanna P. Carotid Artery Stenosis. [Updated 2020 Feb 27]. In: Stat pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2020 Jan—Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442025/. Accessed 8 April 2020.
3. Gorelick PB. The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:417–8.
4. Saka OR, McGuire A, Wolfe CDA. Economic burden of Stroke in England. Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London. 2005. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2005/11/0506452_economic_analysis.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2020.
5. Aboyans V, Ricco J-B, Bartelink M-LEL, Björck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. Editor’s choice—2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European society for vascular surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:763–816.