Abstract
AbstractPartisan theory is not easy to apply to environmental issues. One reason for this is that party families are usually structured according to the left-right dimension. However, such a perspective ignores the fact that the concept of party families stems from a multi-dimensional historical analysis. In order to determine the relevance of the influence of party families on greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), we use a new data set that differentiates between ten party families. An organization theoretical analysis shows that the participation of green parties in government reduces GHGEs. Left parties have much less impact. In contrast, non-Christian center parties have a negative effect on GHGEs. Methodologically, we show that the party effect does not appear in the short term, but only takes effect after more than two years
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference73 articles.
1. Abou-Chadi, Tarik. 2014. Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts—how green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science 46:417–436.
2. Anderson, Liam. 2001. The implications of institutional design for macroeconomic performance. Reassessing the claims of consensus democracy. Comparative Political Studies 34(4):429–452.
3. Armingeon, Klaus, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner, and Sarah Engler. 2020. Comparative political data set 1960–2018. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich.
4. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89(3):634–647.
5. Beramendi, Pablo, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.). 2015. The politics of advanced capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献