Abstract
AbstractUrban Air Mobility has the potential to substantially reduce travel times in some cases of urban-related transportation. Travel time savings strongly depend on fast processing at vertiports, which presents a key challenge considering demand levels’ vertiports would experience when becoming an established mode of transport. This article sheds light on the passenger throughput vertiport airfields can manage and how the operations are sensitive to changes. One main contribution of this article is the introduction of hourly passenger throughput per area as a performance indicator that allows to compare vertiports of different sizes. VoloCity is studied as a reference vehicle and the resulting space requirement of the carefully specified baseline scenario is 188 square-meters per passenger per hour. A total of 13 prominent eVTOL designs are included in the study from which the current design space between maximum vehicle dimension and number of seats is deducted. The study shows that vehicles with a small maximum dimension yield the highest passenger throughput capacity. CityAirbus performs best (46.3 m2/PAX/h) with a diameter of 7.92 m and Archer Maker performs worst (221 m2/PAX/h) with a diameter of 12.2 m. How the performance indicators can be used as rules-of-thumb in the first-order estimations of vertiport throughput capacity or space requirement is described by means of illustrative examples. The insights presented in this paper might be useful for researches, vehicle developers, and municipalities alike.
Funder
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Aerospace Engineering,Transportation
Reference66 articles.
1. Vascik, P.D.: Systems analysis of urban air mobility operational scaling. Ph.D., Department of Aeronautics & Astrophysics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/128057 (2020). Accessed 17 Dec 2022
2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Ed.: UAM Vision Concept of Operations (ConOps) UAM Maturity Level (UML) 4: Version 1.0. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205011091 (2020) Accessed 13 Jul 2022
3. Schuchardt, B.I., et al.: Urban air mobility research at the DLR German Aerospace Center—getting the HorizonUAM project started. In: AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum, virtual event, p. 361. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2021-3197 (2021) Accessed 13 Jul 2022
4. Vascik, P.D. Hansman, J.R.: Scaling constraints for urban air mobility operations: air traffic control, ground infrastructure, and noise. In: 18th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2018, Atlanta. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2018-3849 (2018) Accessed 18 Dec 2022
5. Vascik, P.D., Hansman, J.R.: Constraint identification in on-demand mobility for aviation through an exploratory case study of Los Angeles. In: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Denver. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2017-3083 (2017) Accessed 18 Dec 2022
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献