Abstract
Abstract
Background
The UK’s transition from the European Union creates both an urgent need and key opportunity for the UK and its global collaborators to consider new approaches to the regulation of emerging technologies, underpinned by regulatory science. This survey aimed to identify the most accurate definition of regulatory science, to define strategic areas of the regulation of healthcare innovation which can be informed through regulatory science and to explore the training and infrastructure needed to advance UK and international regulatory science.
Methods
A survey was distributed to UK healthcare professionals, academics, patients, health technology assessment agencies, ethicists and trade associations, as well as international regulators, pharmaceutical companies and small or medium enterprises which have expertise in regulatory science and in developing or applying regulation in healthcare. Subsequently, a descriptive quantitative analyses of survey results and directed thematic analysis of free-text comments were applied.
Results
Priority areas for UK regulatory science identified by 145 participants included the following: flexibility: the capability of regulations to adapt to novel products and target patient outcomes; co-development: collaboration across sectors, e.g. patients, manufacturers, regulators, and educators working together to develop appropriate training for novel product deployment; responsiveness: the preparation of frameworks which enable timely innovation required by emerging events; speed: the rate at which new products can reach the market; reimbursement: developing effective tools to track and evaluate outcomes for “pay for performance” products; and education and professional development.
Conclusions
The UK has a time-critical opportunity to establish its national and international strategy for regulatory science leadership by harnessing broader academic input, developing strategic cross-sector collaborations, incorporating patients’ experiences and perspectives, and investing in a skilled workforce.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
Reference23 articles.
1. Faulkner S. The development of regulatory science in the UK: a scoping study. CASMI; 2018, p. 30.
2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Advancing regulatory science for public health. A framework for FDA's regulatory science initiative. 20; 2010.
3. Steedman M, Taylor K. Ten years on: measuring the return from pharmaceutical innovation. Deloitte Center for Healthcare Solutions; 2019.
4. The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan. What's regulatory science. 2016. http://www.nihs.go.jp/dec/rs_en/whats_rs.html.
5. NHSX. Artificial intelligence: how to get it right. Putting policy into practice for safe data-driven innovation in Health and care. 55; 2019.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献