Opportunities and Risks of UK Medical Device Reform

Author:

Han Ji Eun Diana,Ibrahim Hussein,Aiyegbusi Olalekan Lee,Liu Xiaoxuan,Marston Eliot,Denniston Alastair K.,Calvert Melanie J.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To identify the potential opportunities and risks around future UK regulatory reform of medical devices. Design A mixed methods approach, comprising a rapid literature review, one-to-one, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, a multidisciplinary stakeholder workshop, and a post-workshop survey. Setting United Kingdom. Participants 32 key stakeholders across the medical device sector were identified both from the public and private sectors. Results Opportunities relating to regulatory independence were identified, including the potential to create and implement a regulatory framework that ensures availability of medical devices; innovation and investment potential; and safety to the citizens of the UK. The most significant risks identified included threats to the safety of individual patients and the wider health system arising from the delay in awaiting regulatory approval due to the shortage of approved bodies; and reduced competitiveness of UK market and device manufacturers. Recommendations were identified to mitigate risks, centred on harnessing broader cross-sector collaborations, promoting patient and public partnership, and maximizing international engagement. Conclusions The UK’s medical device sector is at a time-critical juncture to construct a regulatory framework to navigate its exit of Europe and respond to Europe's transition to new medical device regulations whilst also addressing the ongoing demand for rapid approval for new devices in response to the global pandemic. Investment, capacity-building, and international engagement will play a central role in mitigating risks and maximizing opportunities for medical device regulation.

Funder

Research England's Quality-related Research

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Reference22 articles.

1. GHTF Study Group. Information Document Concerning the Definition of the Term “Medical Device” [Internet]. The Global Harmonization Task Force; 2005 May. Available from: http://www.imdrf.org/docs/ghtf/final/sg1/technical-docs/ghtf-sg1-n29r16-2005-definition-medical-device-050520.pdf

2. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Life science sector data, 2020 [Internet]. GOV.UK; 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 26]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/life-science-sector-data-2020

3. Bioscience and Health Technology Sector Analysis 2019. Office for National Statistics; 2020.

4. McHale JV. Health law, Brexit and medical devices: a question of legal regulation and patient safety. Med Law Int. 2018;18(2–3):195–215.

5. UK Conformity Assessment [Internet]. GOV.UK. 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 2]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/uk-conformity-assessment#combining-eu-and-uk-certification

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3