Quality Tolerance Limits’ Place in the Quality Management System and Link to the Statistical Trial Design: Case Studies and Recommendations from Early Adopters

Author:

Wolfs MarionORCID,Bojarski Łukasz,Young Steve,Cesario Lynne,Makowski Marcin,Sullivan Linda B.

Abstract

AbstractSince the release of ICH E6(R2), multiple efforts have been made to interpret the requirements and suggest ways of implementing quality tolerance limits (QTLs) alongside existing risk-based quality management methodologies. While these efforts have contributed positively to developing a common understanding of QTLs, some uncertainty remains regarding implementable approaches. In this article, we review the approaches taken by some leading biopharmaceutical companies, offering recommendations for how to make QTLs most effective, what makes them ineffective, and several case studies to illustrate these concepts. This includes how best to choose QTL parameters and thresholds for a given study, how to differentiate QTLs from key risk indicators, and how QTLs relate to critical-to-quality factors and the statistical design of the trials.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Reference7 articles.

1. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH harmonised guideline: integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E6_R2_Addendum.pdf; 2016, Accessed 18 July 2022.

2. European Medicines Agency. Reflection paper on risk based quality management in clinical trials. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-risk-based-quality-management-clinical-trials_en.pdf; 2013. Accessed 18 July 2022.

3. Bhagat R, Bojarski L, Chevalier S, et al. Quality tolerance limits: framework for successful implementation in clinical development. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021;55:251–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00209-0.

4. Makowski M, Bhagat R, Chevalier S, et al. Historical benchmarks for quality tolerance limits parameters in clinical trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021;55:1265–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00335-3.

5. WCG Metrics Champion Consortium QTL Working Group. Defining quality tolerance limits and key risk indicators that detect risks in a timely manner: reflections from early adopters on emerging best practices (Part 1). Applied Clinical Trials-06-01-2022, Vol. 31, Issue 6. https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/defining-quality-tolerance-limits-and-key-risk-indicators-that-detect-risks-in-a-timely-manner-reflections-from-early-adopters-on-emerging-best-practices-part-1. Accessed 18 July 2022.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3