A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice
-
Published:2023-01-23
Issue:6
Volume:50
Page:1753-1764
-
ISSN:1619-7070
-
Container-title:European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Author:
Pirozzi Palmese Valentina,D’Ambrosio Laura,Di Gennaro Francesca,Maisto Costantina,de Marino Roberta,Morisco Anna,Coluccia Sergio,Di Gennaro Piergiacomo,De Lauro Francesco,Raddi Marco,Gaballo Paolo,Tafuto Salvatore,Celentano Egidio,Lastoria Secondo
Abstract
Abstract
The role of internal dosimetry is usually proposed for investigational purposes in patients treated by RLT, even if its application is not yet the standard method in clinical practice. This limited use is partially justified by several concomitant factors that make calculations a complex process. Therefore, simplified dosimetry protocols are required.
Methods
In our study, dosimetric evaluations were performed in thirty patients with NENs who underwent RLT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. The reference method (M0) calculated the cumulative absorbed dose performing dosimetry after each of the four cycles. Obtained data were employed to assess the feasibility of simplified protocols: defining the dosimetry only after the first cycle (M1) and after the first and last one (M2).
Results
The mean differences of the cumulative absorbed doses between M1 and M0 were – 10% for kidney, – 5% for spleen, + 34% for liver, + 13% for red marrow, and + 37% for tumor lesions. Conversely, differences lower than ± 10% were measured between M2 and M0.
Conclusion
Cumulative absorbed doses obtained with the M2 protocol resembled the doses calculated by M0, while the M1 protocol overestimated the absorbed doses in all organs at risk, except for the spleen.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference39 articles.
1. Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, Mittra E, Kunz PL, Kulke MH, Jacene H, Bushnell D, O’Dorisio TM, Baum RP, Kulkarni HR, Caplin M, Lebtahi R, Hobday T, Delpassand E, Van Cutsem E, Benson A, Srirajaskanthan R, Pavel M, Mora J, Berlin J, Grande E, Reed N, Seregni E, Öberg K, Lopera Sierra M, Santoro P, Thevenet T, Erion JL, Ruszniewski P, Kwekkeboom D, Krenning E, NETTER-1 trial investigators. Phase 3 Trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):125–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607427. 2. European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom on basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation and repealing directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Vols OJ L 13. n.d.;17.1. 2014:1–73. 3. SjogreenGleisner K, Spezi E, Solny P, Gabina PM, Cicone F, Stokke C, Chiesa C, Paphiti M, Brans B, Sandstrom M, et al. Variations in the practice of molecular radiotherapy and implementation of dosimetry: results from a European survey. EJNMMI Phys. 2017;4:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0193-4. 4. Haug AR. PRRT of neuroendocrine tumours: individualized dosimetry or fixed dose scheme? EJNMMI Res. 2020;10:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00623-3. 5. Chiesa C, Strigari L, Pacilio M, Richetta E, Cannatà V, Stasi M, Marzola MC, Schillaci O, Bagni O, Maccauro M. Dosimetric optimization of nuclear medicine therapy based on the Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM and the Italian law N. 101/2020. Position paper and recommendations by the Italian National Associations of Medical Physics (AIFM) and Nuclear Medicine (AIMN). Phys Med. 2021;89:317–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.001.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|