Tumour blood flow for prediction of human prostate cancer aggressiveness: a study with Rubidium-82 PET, MRI and Na+/K+-ATPase-density

Author:

Jochumsen Mads RyøORCID,Sörensen Jens,Pedersen Bodil Ginnerup,Nyengaard Jens Randel,Krag Søren Rasmus Palmelund,Frøkiær Jørgen,Borre Michael,Bouchelouche Kirsten,Tolbod Lars Poulsen

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Tumour blood flow (TBF) is a crucial determinant of cancer growth. Recently, we validated Rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) for TBF measurement in prostate cancer (PCa) and found TBF and cancer aggressiveness positively correlated. The aims of the present study were to determine the ability of TBF for separating significant from insignificant PCa and to examine the relation to underlying Na+/K+-ATPase density, which is relevant as 82Rb is transported intracellularly via the Na+/K+-ATPase. Methods One hundred and two patients were included for pelvic 82Rb PET scan prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy. Findings constituted 100 PCa lesions (86 patients) and 25 benign lesions (16 patients). Tumours were defined on MRI and transferred to 82Rb PET for TBF measurement. Immunohistochemical Na+/K+-ATPase staining was subsequently performed on biopsies. Results TBF was the superior predictor (rho = 0.68, p < 0.0001, inflammatory lesions excluded) of MRI-guided biopsy grade group (GG) over lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (rho = −0.23, p = 0.01), independent of ADC value and tumour volume (p < 0.0001). PET could separate GG-2-5 from GG-1 and benign lesions with an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.79, 96%, and 59%, respectively. For separating GG-3-5 from GG-1-2 and benign lesions the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82, 95%, and 63%, respectively. Na+/K+-ATPase density per PCa cell profile was 38% lower compared with that of the benign prostate cell profiles. Neither cell density nor Na+/K+-ATPase density determined tumour 82Rb uptake. Conclusion TBF is an independent predictor of PCa aggressiveness and deserves more attention, as it may be valuable in separating clinically significant from insignificant PCa.

Funder

Kræftens Bekæmpelse

Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region

P. Carl Petersens Mindefond

Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansens Fond

Harboefonden

Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond

Dagmar Marshalls Fond

Knud og Edith Eriksens Mindefond

Fabrikant Einar Willumsens Mindelegat

Agnes og Poul Friis Fond

Tømmerhandler Vilhelm Bangs Fond

Villum Fonden

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Hotker AM, Mazaheri Y, Aras O, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Gondo T, et al. Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness by use of the combination of quantitative DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(4):756–63. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.14912.

2. Cristel G, Esposito A, Damascelli A, Briganti A, Ambrosi A, Brembilla G, et al. Can DCE-MRI reduce the number of PI-RADS v.2 false positive findings? Role of quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters in prostate lesions characterization. Eur J Radiol. 2019;118:51–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.002.

3. Stabile A, Giganti F, Kasivisvanathan V, Giannarini G, Moore CM, Padhani AR, et al. Factors influencing variability in the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic literature review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.005.

4. Eldred-Evans D, Neves JB, Simmons LAM, Kanthabalan A, McCartan N, Shah TT, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted images and dynamic contrast enhancement in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the PICTURE trial. BJU Int. 2020;125(3):391–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14953.

5. Zawaideh JP, Sala E, Shaida N, Koo B, Warren AY, Carmisciano L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice. Eur Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06782-0.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3