Author:
Williams Jason M.,Arlinghaus Lori R.,Rani Sudheer D.,Shone Martha D.,Abramson Vandana G.,Pendyala Praveen,Chakravarthy A. Bapsi,Gorge William J.,Knowland Joshua G.,Lattanze Ronald K.,Perrin Steven R.,Scarantino Charles W.,Townsend David W.,Abramson Richard G.,Yankeelov Thomas E.
Funder
National Cancer Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference15 articles.
1. Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:11S–20S. doi:
10.2967/jnumed.108.057182
.
2. Hall NC, Zhang J, Reid R, Hurley D, Knopp MV. Impact of FDG extravasation on SUV measurements in clinical PET/CT. Should we routinely scan the injection site? J Nucl Med. 2006;47(Supplement 1):115P.
3. Helm RE, Klausner JD, Klemperer JD, Flint LM, Huang E. Accepted but unacceptable: peripheral IV catheter failure. J Infus Nurs. 2015;38(3):189–203. doi:
10.1097/NAN.0000000000000100
.
4. Osman MM, Muzaffar R, Altinyay ME, Teymouri C. FDG dose extravasations in PET/CT: frequency and impact on SUV measurements. Front Oncol. 2011;1:41. doi:
10.3389/fonc.2011.00041
.
5. Silva-Rodriguez J, Aguiar P, Sanchez M, Mosquera J, Luna-Vega V, Cortes J, et al. Correction for FDG PET dose extravasations: Monte Carlo validation and quantitative evaluation of patient studies. Med Phys. 2014;41(5):052502. doi:
10.1118/1.4870979
.